The “standard” D wall radial thickness for a 4.020 bore is .183”...... so the problem is the pistons don’t have a “standard” ring groove depth.
Normally I’d say it wouldn’t be an issue to source some .155 radial thickness rings...... but these days it might be a little tuff.
Make some calls.
Speed-Talk is running on www.Speed-Talk.com
IMPORTANT: Update your bookmarks to https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/
(Right-click the URL and select "Bookmark this link")
IMPORTANT: Update your bookmarks to https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/
(Right-click the URL and select "Bookmark this link")
Search found 1285 matches
- Tue May 24, 2022 7:41 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: top ring puzzle
- Replies: 13
- Views: 442
- Sun May 22, 2022 1:04 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for the BBF guys......
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
Re: Question for the BBF guys......
They’re not much fun moving around in the shop from bench to bench though. 

- Sun May 22, 2022 12:30 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for the BBF guys......
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
- Sun May 22, 2022 12:27 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Dyno tuned 434 SBC 11:1 AFR 245 Solid Roller
- Replies: 66
- Views: 4960
Re: Dyno tuned 434 SBC 11:1 AFR 245 Solid Roller
Scott I think your car is awesome so please don't take this the wrong way, hp to car weight says you are 100hp off. So far, I’m basically on that same train of thought. I use the Moroso PS calculator to get a feel for what I think the performance should be. With the dyno I use, the better running c...
- Sun May 22, 2022 12:08 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for the BBF guys......
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
Re: Question for the BBF guys......
Well, that’s more duration than what will be used with the ones I did...... so it should be good.
- Sat May 21, 2022 7:20 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for the BBF guys......
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
Re: Question for the BBF guys......
What were the cam specs you ran with those heads?
The B3V BD is the CJ-HP head.
In theory, with a 2.30/1.72 valve combo you’d have had about .030-.035” seated valve-to-valve clearance.......depending on how deep the seats were cut and how thick the valve margins are.
The B3V BD is the CJ-HP head.
In theory, with a 2.30/1.72 valve combo you’d have had about .030-.035” seated valve-to-valve clearance.......depending on how deep the seats were cut and how thick the valve margins are.
- Mon May 16, 2022 6:57 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Aluminum vs iron heads on a 9:1 daily driver
- Replies: 31
- Views: 1177
- Mon May 16, 2022 2:05 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Dyno tuned 434 SBC 11:1 AFR 245 Solid Roller
- Replies: 66
- Views: 4960
Re: Dyno tuned 434 SBC 11:1 AFR 245 Solid Roller
Has the car been scaled since the engine swap?
It’ll get a little heavier with the hood on it, yes?
It’ll get a little heavier with the hood on it, yes?
- Mon May 16, 2022 10:43 am
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Aluminum vs iron heads on a 9:1 daily driver
- Replies: 31
- Views: 1177
Re: Aluminum vs iron heads on a 9:1 daily driver
The basic combo outlined in the OP seems like it would be served just fine by some slightly reworked factory heads.
It would come down to cost for me.
Whatever the best bang for the buck is that fits the application.
It would come down to cost for me.
Whatever the best bang for the buck is that fits the application.
- Sat May 14, 2022 7:26 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for the BBF guys......
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
Re: Question for the BBF guys......
Eliminator offers three varieties of this head.
This “BD” version has normal CJ intake ports, and the exhaust uses std Ford headers.
The overall height of the head is quite tall, and they use pretty long valves, which seems to be more for the version with the raised A460 style ports.
This “BD” version has normal CJ intake ports, and the exhaust uses std Ford headers.
The overall height of the head is quite tall, and they use pretty long valves, which seems to be more for the version with the raised A460 style ports.
- Fri May 13, 2022 6:38 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question about the stock 1970 426 Hemi hyd. lifters?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 601
Re: Question about the stock 1970 426 Hemi hyd. lifters?
Have you indicated across the lobe to see how much taper it has? I usually check it on the base circle. FWIW, which isn’t much........ in 42 years of messing with Mopars....... I’ve never seen a mention of the Hemi having a low taper cam & lifters. I’ve measured quite a few stock and stock replacemt...
- Fri May 13, 2022 5:34 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: 383 sbc first dyno experience
- Replies: 58
- Views: 1578
Re: 383 sbc first dyno experience
Nice job!!
It hangs on up top quite well with as short as the intake lobe is.
It hangs on up top quite well with as short as the intake lobe is.
- Fri May 13, 2022 5:24 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Engine Diagnosis
- Replies: 39
- Views: 1261
Re: Engine Diagnosis
Any gas smell in the oil?
I’m also on board with trying another “known good” carb, and/or ignition.
Anyone checked the voltage at the ignition?
I’m also on board with trying another “known good” carb, and/or ignition.
Anyone checked the voltage at the ignition?
- Fri May 13, 2022 4:06 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for the BBF guys......
- Replies: 24
- Views: 1407
Re: Question for the BBF guys......
Just a little follow up with these...... I ended up cutting the valves down to 2.23/1.73. The seats had already been machined for the 2.25/1.76, so a little sinking was required to accommodate the smaller valves. In the end the seated valve to valve clearance ended up at .060”-.065” with the heads a...
- Mon May 02, 2022 4:22 pm
- Forum: Engine Tech
- Topic: Question for cam gurus
- Replies: 35
- Views: 1623
Re: Question for cam gurus
I figured that’s what you meant....... I just wanted to point it out and give you the chance to respond instead of leaving out there on the interwebs for eternity.