Knife edge runner openings on single plane manifolds?

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

SchmidtMotorWorks
Vendor
Posts: 11003
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
Location: CA

Knife edge runner openings on single plane manifolds?

Post by SchmidtMotorWorks »

Has anyone tried knife-edging the walls that divide adjacent runners on single plane manifolds?
shawn
Expert
Expert
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:09 pm
Location: Northwest
Contact:

Post by shawn »

You want a very large radius at the point of entry on those runners.Knifeedging them is a common mistake that is done. If you go to Larry's site @ www.maxracesoftware.com he has some beautiful pictures of what a runner divider should look like. They are far from sharp.
Shawn
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

Re: Knife edge runner openings on single plane manifolds?

Post by cboggs »

SchmidtMotorWorks wrote:Has anyone tried knife-edging the walls that divide adjacent runners on single plane manifolds?
Yes like Shawn said, and Larry has pictures of, .. a nice rounded
divider works much better, .. the bigger the radius the better.

In the 80's I did a bunch of testing on this, divider wall leingth, width, ..
etc.

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
SchmidtMotorWorks
Vendor
Posts: 11003
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
Location: CA

Post by SchmidtMotorWorks »

Thanks fot the advice on the knife edging, you just saved me from wasting a lot of time!
ChrisU
Pro
Pro
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 12:29 pm
Location:

Post by ChrisU »

Depends on what you want to do with the runners. A large radius isn't always possible if you're looking to make the opening a certain size. It's all relative to sizing and application. I don't believe in a knife edge per say, but it might be thin depending on the applicaiton.
Uratchko Racing Engines
248-755-5556
ADR
Member
Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:37 pm
Location: Auburn, Wa

Post by ADR »

What about the devider in a 4V cylinder head...you are now much closer to the intake valves. Would it still have to be a bull nose shape down in the intake port itself ??

Thanks Dale
Shaun
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 6:10 pm
Location:

Post by Shaun »

ADR wrote:What about the devider in a 4V cylinder head...you are now much closer to the intake valves. Would it still have to be a bull nose shape down in the intake port itself ??

Thanks Dale
Not really answering your question, but related to 4V cyl heads - Hans Hermann in one of his presentations mentioned that the divider wall should be at the very least, 250% the intake valve throat diameter. Reason he gave was that airflow needs to stabilize after breaking up BEFORE getting to the turn.

=====

I am curious to know the reason(s) why bull nosing is better for flow vs knife edging if someone would be so kind as to explain. Thank you
User avatar
panic
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Ecbatana
Contact:

Post by panic »

"the divider wall should be at the very least, 250% the intake valve throat diameter"?

How is that possible? 1.50" valve, 1.275" throat requires 3.1875" wall thickness?
bill jones
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2650
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:38 pm
Location: salt lake city, ut
Contact:

Post by bill jones »

-maybe that 250% was the length of the divider.
SchmidtMotorWorks
Vendor
Posts: 11003
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
Location: CA

Post by SchmidtMotorWorks »

25% ?
RHC
New Member
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 11:28 am
Location: michigan
Contact:

Post by RHC »

you should try cutting the port divder diagnoly in a 4 valve head cutting it back more towards the roof of the port .when working in a manifold the teer drop shape is suposed to be the most aerodynamic shape the air will follow the walls of the divider sooner
Shaun
Member
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2004 6:10 pm
Location:

Post by Shaun »

panic wrote:"the divider wall should be at the very least, 250% the intake valve throat diameter"?

How is that possible? 1.50" valve, 1.275" throat requires 3.1875" wall thickness?
Sorry for using the wrong words and not being clear. I wrote that after going 36 hours without sleep :oops:

The LENGTH of the dividing wall should be at least 250% the diameter of the intake PORT throat.
Ken_Parkman
Expert
Expert
Posts: 663
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:30 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by Ken_Parkman »

My understanding of why bullnosing the divider is better is that the airflow is not continuous, so some of the cycle the air in the adjacent runner is static or close to it. That means if it was a sharp edge the air would be pulled around a sharp corner on that side of the runner instead of a radius, tremendously poor for flow.

If both runners were flowing in phase a knife edge would probably be better.
ADR
Member
Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 10:37 pm
Location: Auburn, Wa

Post by ADR »

My thinking was that now that you are down in the port and it is a wet flow condition that the knife edge would help prevent knocking the fuel back into larger droplets but then again that same thing could be said for the manifold deviders that was originally talked about.
Dale
User avatar
cboggs
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1881
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 6:03 pm
Location: virginia beach, VA
Contact:

Post by cboggs »

RHC wrote:when working in a manifold the teer drop shape is suposed to be the most aerodynamic shape the air will follow the walls of the divider sooner
Yep, .. spot on, .. ever sit looking out the window of the air plane
you're on, .. raining, .. watch the water drops across the surface of the wing,
If a knife edge was a better aerodynamic shape, .. wouldn't the airplane
wing be knife edged, .. wouldn't the nose of that plane be pointed like an arrow
instead of rounded???

Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
Post Reply