Knife edge runner openings on single plane manifolds?
Moderator: Team
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 11003
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: CA
Knife edge runner openings on single plane manifolds?
Has anyone tried knife-edging the walls that divide adjacent runners on single plane manifolds?
You want a very large radius at the point of entry on those runners.Knifeedging them is a common mistake that is done. If you go to Larry's site @ www.maxracesoftware.com he has some beautiful pictures of what a runner divider should look like. They are far from sharp.
Shawn
Shawn
Re: Knife edge runner openings on single plane manifolds?
Yes like Shawn said, and Larry has pictures of, .. a nice roundedSchmidtMotorWorks wrote:Has anyone tried knife-edging the walls that divide adjacent runners on single plane manifolds?
divider works much better, .. the bigger the radius the better.
In the 80's I did a bunch of testing on this, divider wall leingth, width, ..
etc.
Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 11003
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: CA
Depends on what you want to do with the runners. A large radius isn't always possible if you're looking to make the opening a certain size. It's all relative to sizing and application. I don't believe in a knife edge per say, but it might be thin depending on the applicaiton.
Uratchko Racing Engines
248-755-5556
248-755-5556
Not really answering your question, but related to 4V cyl heads - Hans Hermann in one of his presentations mentioned that the divider wall should be at the very least, 250% the intake valve throat diameter. Reason he gave was that airflow needs to stabilize after breaking up BEFORE getting to the turn.ADR wrote:What about the devider in a 4V cylinder head...you are now much closer to the intake valves. Would it still have to be a bull nose shape down in the intake port itself ??
Thanks Dale
=====
I am curious to know the reason(s) why bull nosing is better for flow vs knife edging if someone would be so kind as to explain. Thank you
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2650
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:38 pm
- Location: salt lake city, ut
- Contact:
Sorry for using the wrong words and not being clear. I wrote that after going 36 hours without sleeppanic wrote:"the divider wall should be at the very least, 250% the intake valve throat diameter"?
How is that possible? 1.50" valve, 1.275" throat requires 3.1875" wall thickness?
The LENGTH of the dividing wall should be at least 250% the diameter of the intake PORT throat.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
My understanding of why bullnosing the divider is better is that the airflow is not continuous, so some of the cycle the air in the adjacent runner is static or close to it. That means if it was a sharp edge the air would be pulled around a sharp corner on that side of the runner instead of a radius, tremendously poor for flow.
If both runners were flowing in phase a knife edge would probably be better.
If both runners were flowing in phase a knife edge would probably be better.
Yep, .. spot on, .. ever sit looking out the window of the air planeRHC wrote:when working in a manifold the teer drop shape is suposed to be the most aerodynamic shape the air will follow the walls of the divider sooner
you're on, .. raining, .. watch the water drops across the surface of the wing,
If a knife edge was a better aerodynamic shape, .. wouldn't the airplane
wing be knife edged, .. wouldn't the nose of that plane be pointed like an arrow
instead of rounded???
Curtis
Race Flow Development
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com
Simultaneous 5-axis CNC Porting
http://www.raceflowdevelopment.com