Chamber Grooves - what do you guys think?

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
SupStk
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1913
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Box Elder, SD

Post by SupStk »

MadBill wrote:My question is: If complete vaporization is such a panacea, why do natural gas and propane engines (even those using liquid propane injection) get at best virtually identical fuel economy to gasoline ones? (and before anyone claims they don't, I worked for 10 years on GM's Alternative Fuel programs. The bi-fuel natural gas trucks and car we sold were usually certified within 1% city and highway mileage (energy basis) on the two fuels.
I agree with you testing chamber grooves would be interesting and auctually not that difficult.

I wasn't aware that propane certified that well. At one time I worked on the line at a Chevrolet dealership. As a truck tech I dealt with service issues on motorhomes as well. Quite often there were mileage complaints on dual fuel RV's when running propane.

It has been my experience the same vehicle on propane will have less power and about 10% less fuel economy (MPG) than on gasoline.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Post by MadBill »

SupStk wrote:...I wasn't aware that propane certified that well. At one time I worked on the line at a Chevrolet dealership. As a truck tech I dealt with service issues on motorhomes as well. Quite often there were mileage complaints on dual fuel RV's when running propane.

It has been my experience the same vehicle on propane will have less power and about 10% less fuel economy (MPG) than on gasoline.
Absolutely correct! Propane has significantly less energy per gallon, which is how it is sold, than gasoline, thus reducing mileage. Also, it is normally introduced as a gas, causing significant "charge displacement" (reduced volume of air drwn in), which reduces the power.
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
putztastics
Expert
Expert
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: ND
Contact:

Post by putztastics »

Automotivebreath and I have been PMing - I'm planning to do a grooves test on my Dodge 360 dyno test mule, I just have to get a few other things done first.

It will be a back to back test on the same day. And since the grooves apparently affect more than power, ie the idle, I plan to use an LM-1 wide band meter to log any changes in the A/F ratio, idle speed and intake manifold vacuum.

This must sound scary, two guys named "automotivebreath" and "putztastics" planning a "scientific" test, or a test of any sort for that matter.

A second opinion test, or specific advice, wouldn't hurt, if any are so inclined.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Post by MadBill »

Well, besides the basic TBDs of comparing power curves and minimum idle speeds, the next most obvious ones would be comparison of MBT SA, LBT AFR, B.S.F.C., EGTs and cylinder to cylinder variation, engine vacuum at minimum 'non-groove' stable idle vs. same RPM with grooves and V.E.
If the dyno cell has 4 gas analyser capability, idle emissions would also be a barometer of combustion quality. [Could compare with idle mixture screws (4 corner idle preferred) at leanest good idle for non-groove, then same settings grooved, and finally leanest for grooved at same RPM.]

If the engine can be muffled or fitted with knock sensors or a stethoscope, one could track the knock limit through the RPM range, using low octane fuel...
(man, I get on a such a roll when I'm spending OPM!*)
*Other People's Money
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
automotive breath
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:54 pm
Location:

Post by automotive breath »

Calypso wrote:1. Compression stroke burn improvement: Hi speed jet in the middle of the chamber would cause 2 contra rotating swirls (intake and exhaust side) that improve the burn rate and make it more complete by throwing gas into the flames. Actually this mod would likely allow more compression by swirling the unburned detonation sensitive mixture from the area cylinder wall side of the intake valve. (based on the thinking that better ionized exhaust side mixture tends to burn first and compress the end gas to the intake side)
I don’t claim to be an expert on the topic of combustion but I have given this a lot of thought. The altered fluid flow ATDC of compression likely feeds the advancing flame front and creates additional mixture movement and improved squish flow placement. The fuel air mix contains 70% nitrogen. The additional movement and placement better exposes the air fuel to generate a hotter faster flame that burns more completely. If this is indeed the case it would explain the clean running oil and plugs.

I have found that the grooved engine is more detonation resistant; I’m running 10:1 compression in my modified tow truck. I agree with Calypso, swirling the unburned detonation sensitive mixture from the area cylinder wall side of the intake valve is the key.
Calypso wrote:2. exhaust stroke idle improvement. This is based on how I think reversion behaves. Most of the flow in the ports at low lifts is along short turns. Hi speed jet near intake short turn causes local pressure minimum pulling mixture to the chamber at overlap. Pressure recovery from the jet at plug side causes a local hi pressure region at exhaust port short side inhibiting exhaust flow into the chamber.
This I haven’t given much thought but I think you are on to something. When I ask about a second groove, Somender recommends one pointing directly at the exhaust valve on the opposite side of the chamber from the first groove.
Calypso wrote:#2 also would explain why bigger quench distance would improve burn: Low pressure area at groove would be able to more easily evacuate the unburned mixture from quench pad area.
Here we agree again. I have found with the grooves there is an advantage to open up the quench distance. I’m very interested to see how the burn pattern looks on the modified engine. When you look at the last picture I posted the burn pattern was very incomplete.
Calypso wrote:To me it makes sense. I think I'm going to try it... with couple of obvious improvements. :D
Please communicate obvious improvements. I’m grooving two to three sets of heads a month and I’m willing to try improvements and communicate results.
automotive breath
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:54 pm
Location:

Post by automotive breath »

jacksoni wrote:As MadBill says, have to do a real a-b-a testing with only the single design change. Automotive breath says will just put these grooves in and port them up a bit and see what happens. Indeed the chamber burn pattern may look different after but how do you tell what changed what? .
I agree controlled tests will be needed. Combining grooves with porting and any other performance modification muddies the water. All of my testing has been done in cars, at the track or on the street. Many times other modifications are included, I realize this does little to convince others of the benefits.
automotive breath
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:54 pm
Location:

Post by automotive breath »

SupStk wrote: I agree with you testing chamber grooves would be interesting and auctually not that difficult.
putztastics wrote:Automotivebreath and I have been PMing - I'm planning to do a grooves test on my Dodge 360 dyno test mule, I just have to get a few other things done first.

It will be a back to back test on the same day. And since the grooves apparently affect more than power, ie the idle, I plan to use an LM-1 wide band meter to log any changes in the A/F ratio, idle speed and intake manifold vacuum.

This must sound scary, two guys named "automotivebreath" and "putztastics" planning a "scientific" test, or a test of any sort for that matter.

A second opinion test, or specific advice, wouldn't hurt, if any are so inclined.
MadBill wrote:Well, besides the basic TBDs of comparing power curves and minimum idle speeds, the next most obvious ones would be comparison of MBT SA, LBT AFR, B.S.F.C., EGTs and cylinder to cylinder variation, engine vacuum at minimum 'non-groove' stable idle vs. same RPM with grooves and V.E.
If the dyno cell has 4 gas analyser capability, idle emissions would also be a barometer of combustion quality. [Could compare with idle mixture screws (4 corner idle preferred) at leanest good idle for non-groove, then same settings grooved, and finally leanest for grooved at same RPM.]

If the engine can be muffled or fitted with knock sensors or a stethoscope, one could track the knock limit through the RPM range, using low octane fuel...
(man, I get on a such a roll when I'm spending OPM!*)
*Other People's Money
In addition it would be good to test oil contamination. On of the most desirable benefits of the grooved engine is how the oil runs clean. Before and after oil analysis would document improvements.
putztastics wrote: This must sound scary, two guys named "automotivebreath" and "putztastics" planning a "scientific" test, or a test of any sort for that matter.
With expertise from the likes of MadBill and SupStk; could we possibly convince the world?
Last edited by automotive breath on Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
putztastics
Expert
Expert
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:42 pm
Location: ND
Contact:

Post by putztastics »

MadBill wrote:Well, besides the basic TBDs of comparing power curves and minimum idle speeds, the next most obvious ones would be comparison of MBT SA, LBT AFR, B.S.F.C., EGTs and cylinder to cylinder variation, engine vacuum at minimum 'non-groove' stable idle vs. same RPM with grooves and V.E.
If the dyno cell has 4 gas analyser capability, idle emissions would also be a barometer of combustion quality. [Could compare with idle mixture screws (4 corner idle preferred) at leanest good idle for non-groove, then same settings grooved, and finally leanest for grooved at same RPM.]

If the engine can be muffled or fitted with knock sensors or a stethoscope, one could track the knock limit through the RPM range, using low octane fuel...
(man, I get on a such a roll when I'm spending OPM!*)
*Other People's Money
Yo Bill!

That does sound like OPM as my dyno is not that well equipped.

What do you expect from a putz anyway?
automotive breath
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:54 pm
Location:

Post by automotive breath »

Hi all,
I have been grooving heads for one year now and I'm starting to get heads back after run time. Here's the latest from a 13:1 355. Comments?

Image

Image

One of my projects is my tow truck (95 Suburban). I shaved the heads 0.050" to raise the compression to 10:1 and cut the grooves. The truck runs better than ever. At 10:1 compression on 87 octane it pulls my loaded down enclosed trailed effortlessly. I was hoping to have some solid fuel consumption numbers by now. Fuel consumption has been reduced, problems with the TBI have caused inconsistent numbers.

Here's a link to some of the work that was done this year

http://somender-singh.com/content/view/68/49/

Cheers,
AB
Stevespeed
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 494
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:25 am
Location: Phoenix AZ area

Post by Stevespeed »

What happened to your dyno session?
automotive breath
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:54 pm
Location:

Post by automotive breath »

Stevespeed wrote:What happened to your dyno session?
Hi Steve, putztastics is planning on testing a 360 Dodge when he catches up in his shop.
putztastics wrote:Automotivebreath and I have been PMing - I'm planning to do a grooves test on my Dodge 360 dyno test mule, I just have to get a few other things done first.

It will be a back to back test on the same day. And since the grooves apparently affect more than power, ie the idle, I plan to use an LM-1 wide band meter to log any changes in the A/F ratio, idle speed and intake manifold vacuum.

This must sound scary, two guys named "automotivebreath" and "putztastics" planning a "scientific" test, or a test of any sort for that matter.

A second opinion test, or specific advice, wouldn't hurt, if any are so inclined.
SUPRSLO
Member
Member
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:34 pm
Location: Salisubyr, Maryland

Post by SUPRSLO »

Not to beat a dead horse but has anyone done any quantitative testing yet? This is very very interesting for sure. Thanks.
I love this stuff!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Post by MadBill »

automotive breath wrote:Hi all,
I have been grooving heads for one year now and I'm starting to get heads back after run time. Here's the latest from a 13:1 355. Comments?...AB
Hey AB, in your first shot of a used head, there is a small area at 12:00 and a larger arc at 6:00 that look like the piston might be rocking enough to just kiss the head. What squish is in this one? (I think earlier posts indicated larger than minimum might work best)
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
automotive breath
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1681
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 11:54 pm
Location:

Post by automotive breath »

MadBill wrote:Hey AB, in your first shot of a used head, there is a small area at 12:00 and a larger arc at 6:00 that look like the piston might be rocking enough to just kiss the head. What squish is in this one? (I think earlier posts indicated larger than minimum might work best)
This engine ran with < than 0.40" piston to head clearance with steel rods at 7500 RPM. This year the stroke was changed to 3.75" raising the compression and the squish clearance will be opened, I don't remember what was decided, something like 0.050" to 0.060".
liquigas
New Member
New Member
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:49 pm
Location:

What's Happening?

Post by liquigas »

Oil price$ keep going through the roof.

What gives?

Did Putz see something important?

Where's the numbers?
-insert pithy comment here-
Post Reply