462 double hump hp capability
Moderator: Team
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
correct i didnt state it needed to be oem headed. my fault. but it has to be under 305 inches with an oem head. everything else is all game. its going to be in a tuff truck(dirt racing). the car will be around 3400 with a turbo 350, a dana 300, and chevy half ton rears. not sure on gearing yet(there are some open straight aways and narrow points). i figured the only motors that would compare would be the scca cars of the 60's with the 302 chevys so that is what i voted to build. im just curious what the potentials are of them. also, i will be running alcohol.
- af2
- Guru
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
- Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
That alone will be tough to get to 14:1 and better to make the alcohol work.jeepracer wrote:i will be running alcohol.
GURU is only a name.
Adam
Adam
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
i know its not what i origionally posted but, if i were to use 1.94 heads that are fully ported, what is its potential then? i looked over the rules and for some reason the chevy 2.02 valved heads are placed in a higher class that i dont want to be in.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:07 pm
- Location: West Michigan
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
At 302c.i. and with a 4" bore size, I think a 1.94 might be better than a 2.02.
- Dave Koehler
- Vendor
- Posts: 7205
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 11:19 pm
- Location: Urbana, IL USA
- Contact:
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
In the right hands the 461 would be fine. Guess it will have to be, yes?
Are you limited to OEM cast iron? Cast iron being the key word here.
Here, you need this tool or it's more advanced brothers.
http://performancetrends.com/Engine-Analyzer.htm
and/or this
http://maxracesoftware.com/pipemax36xp2.htm
Are you limited to OEM cast iron? Cast iron being the key word here.
Here, you need this tool or it's more advanced brothers.
http://performancetrends.com/Engine-Analyzer.htm
and/or this
http://maxracesoftware.com/pipemax36xp2.htm
Dave Koehler - Koehler Injection
Enderle Fuel Injection - Nitrous Charger - Balancing - Nitrous Master software
http://www.koehlerinjection.com
"Never let a race car know that you are in a hurry."
Enderle Fuel Injection - Nitrous Charger - Balancing - Nitrous Master software
http://www.koehlerinjection.com
"Never let a race car know that you are in a hurry."
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
If it has to be oem based, use the GenIII engines.
A 4.8 is 293Cid. 3.27 stroke, 3.78 bore, and the head choices are way better. Theres also oem aluminum 5.3 blocks you can get to cut weight down for decently priced.
Yeroon
EDIT: posting or linking the exact rules would be helpful
A 4.8 is 293Cid. 3.27 stroke, 3.78 bore, and the head choices are way better. Theres also oem aluminum 5.3 blocks you can get to cut weight down for decently priced.
Yeroon
EDIT: posting or linking the exact rules would be helpful
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 2:53 pm
- Location:
- Contact:
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
it is amazing how many tracks have rules that mandate those heads for stock classes ,,,
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
One more consideration on double humps: IME circle track they are more prone to cracking on alcohol (thermal shock?).
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
yes i am limited to oem cast iron heads.Are you limited to OEM cast iron?
thanks all for your input.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location:
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
I'm pretty sure there's no rule. Just curious, How much power will a fully potted set of vortec heads make with oem size valves on this setup?
-
- Expert
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 2:17 pm
- Location: Surrey, BC
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
I had to check, thought I had clicked on the HAMB by mistake...Keith Morganstein wrote:you mean he can't just use 462 heads with Z28 springs, a big cam and rev it to 10K?Dave Koehler wrote:Mondello = oem heads reworked by Joe Mondello
Be careful what you wish for. The term budget is about to go out the window.jeepracer wrote: ....... so the low rpms dont do anything for me!
Repeat: aftermarket heads.
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
Keith Morganstein wrote:you mean he can't just use 462 heads with Z28 springs, a big cam and rev it to 10K?
According to some of the folks you meet at car shows and cruise nights, EVERY 283,302,327 w/ Z/28 springs, 462 heads, and a big cam was shifted at 10k rpm "back in the good 'ol days".
-
- Expert
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 4:07 pm
- Location: West Michigan
Re: 462 double hump hp capability
novadude wrote:Keith Morganstein wrote:you mean he can't just use 462 heads with Z28 springs, a big cam and rev it to 10K?
According to some of the folks you meet at car shows and cruise nights, EVERY 283,302,327 w/ Z/28 springs, 462 heads, and a big cam was shifted at 10k rpm "back in the good 'ol days".
LOL. I've had guys tell me about the stock 265 in their 56 Chevy they had back in the day that beat everything on the street. Nothing could touch it.