Page 1 of 3

recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 8:35 pm
by csx7031
I'd like input from those who have experience using a wideband AFR meter to tune carbs. I don't need a data logger or a lot of extras. I just want accuracy repeatability, and reliability. It will not be permanently installed in any of my cars.

Thanks in Advance,
Chuck

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 8:37 pm
by Casper393W
I have the Fast unit and I love it!

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:41 pm
by 427dart
I have the AEM gauge and seems to work fine with a nice digital readout. Before this one I had the original LM-1 unit for years.
It's only used to check my carb tune if something seems not right and then put away.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:48 pm
by prairiehotrodder
I have the AEM failsafe with data logging. The data logging is nice because if you are tuning WOT at the track you don't have to take your eyes off the road.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 12:52 am
by David Redszus
prairiehotrodder wrote: Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:48 pm I have the AEM failsafe with data logging. The data logging is nice because if you are tuning WOT at the track you don't have to take your eyes off the road.
If you add a throttle position sensor to your logger, you would be able to tune partial throttle mixture which is very difficult and seldom done.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 8:49 am
by kimosabi
Daytona Sensors wego 3

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 11:07 am
by Alaskaracer
Innovate LM2. I happen to have one for sale as well if you're interested. Pm me if so.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 11:34 am
by BigBlocksOnTop2
I have Zietronics. A bung in header pipe off the head. Pain to move it around but I collect data from each cylinder. There's a big difference on a dual plane intake I will say.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 12:07 pm
by F-BIRD'88
NTK Powerdex AFX Gen 2 AFR gauge.
https://www.jegs.com/i/NGK-Spark-Plugs/ ... 7/10002/-1

I don't have this as I use a heated Narrow band setup but for wideband this is what I recomend.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:12 pm
by Tuner
Innovate LM-2 has the most flexibility, can be used as just an A/F gauge but it is also a 32 channel data recorder with ability to log RPM, TPS, MAP (vacuum), EGT, etc, on and on, whatever you would need to tune an engine with carburetors or EFI. LM-2 has four built-in analog inputs plus RPM, which is plenty for adding TPS and MAP, but other Innovate devices can expand the number of channels to 32 if you want more information than you need.

https://www.innovatemotorsports.com/products/lm2.php

For a simple A/F gauge, the MTX-L is my choice. The LED display is easy to read. For simple drivability tuning just using a vacuum guage and A/F display, if you don't want to data record, the MTX-L is simple and easy.

https://www.innovatemotorsports.com/pro ... l_plus.php

I use one or the other of these nearly every time I tune carbs, along with other Innovate accessories like the RPM Clamp to get an induction RPM input for the LM-2 if the car doesn't have a CD box with dedicated RPM output which can be wired direct to the RPM input.

Like David Redszus mentioned a few posts back, combining TPS and MAP with A/F is extremely useful to really dial in part-throttle tuning, which is where you accomplish minimum fuel consumption. WOT is easy, tuning level ground and light acceleration is where you gain the best fuel economy and maximum engine life by dialing in the minimum fuel necessary for the light load.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:32 pm
by BigBlockMopar
I've got a pair of Innovate MTX-L's.
Use one of them somewhat permanent in my daily driven propane powered '73 Dodge Dart, the other one (together with the 1st one) is used as a pair occassionaly on a rollercammed 496ci bigblock Mopar with vintage longram intakes. If one engine needs 2 AFR-gauges than this one is it.

Only issue I have is the O2-sensors don't live long.
The one in my daily is on it's 2nd or 3rd sensor I believe. Some time after startup the sensor starts to give funky readings and the gauge then goes into error-mode.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:46 pm
by cjperformance
MTX-L , i have fitted many these to customers cars, when they ask 'do i need a dyno tune' i say no, invest in a wb02 and you have more than the dyno guy can give you and it cheaper!
I have them on n/a, turbo, sc( and LPG n/a and turbo ). Never had to replace one due to failure , never had a sensor fail. Great units.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 7:28 pm
by Tuner
bigblockmopar wrote: Mon Jun 11, 2018 3:32 pm I've got a pair of Innovate MTX-L's.
Use one of them somewhat permanent in my daily driven propane powered '73 Dodge Dart, the other one (together with the 1st one) is used as a pair occassionaly on a rollercammed 496ci bigblock Mopar with vintage longram intakes. If one engine needs 2 AFR-gauges than this one is it.

Only issue I have is the O2-sensors don't live long.
The one in my daily is on it's 2nd or 3rd sensor I believe. Some time after startup the sensor starts to give funky readings and the gauge then goes into error-mode.
I was having an occasional E-8 on my LM-2 when it was connected to the vehicle battery with an extension cord I made with alligator clamps, a cigarette lighter socket and 16 ga. wire. I made another with an old household extension cord with 14 ga. wire and now it doesn't throw the E=8 error code. I don't understand exactly why it didn't give the E-9 code, which is for low voltage. The E-8 is "Sensor Timing error (typically a damaged sensor)". It occurred more often with two of the several sensors I have, which are the oldest of the bunch, but it hasn't happened with them using the larger gauge extension cord.

I can tell you what kills sensors is if they are not protected from rain water splashing on them when they are hot, or if you are tuning E-85 and forget to turn of the controller while you're changing jets and then you start the engine with a puddle of fuel in the intake and a big glob of that E-85 hits the hot sensors.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 7:35 pm
by user-23911
cjperformance wrote: Mon Jun 11, 2018 5:46 pm MTX-L , i have fitted many these to customers cars, when they ask 'do i need a dyno tune' i say no, invest in a wb02 and you have more than the dyno guy can give you and it cheaper!
I have them on n/a, turbo, sc( and LPG n/a and turbo ). Never had to replace one due to failure , never had a sensor fail. Great units.

Unfortunately when the sensor starts to read wrong, you won't know...........as they all do over time, they have a limited life span.


You can't go wrong with a bosch NB sensor that's been previously bench tested (plenty free ones in junkyards), use that alongside whatever WB you've got .
WB sensors are accurate at the lean side of lambda 1. They're nowhere near as accurate as everyone tries to make out when richer than lambda 1.
That's where the NB comes in....as a backup. Used with a voltmeter.



Fitting such things to customers cars and not seeing them again........it's not the same as using them on your own cars and using them over a period of many years.
prairiehotrodder wrote: Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:48 pm I have the AEM failsafe with data logging. The data logging is nice because if you are tuning WOT at the track you don't have to take your eyes off the road.
A failsafe isn't a failsafe if it can't detect knock.

Re: recommendation for wideband meter for carbs

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2018 7:40 pm
by csx7031
My thanks to all who responded, it is appreciated. It seems everyone likes what they have. Has anyone tried more than one AFRM and thought one was better than the other? The replacement sensors for the NGK/NTK unit cost more than the others. Any reason that makes them more accurate? Thanks for schooling me on this topic. Chuck