1960's engine wars

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
Turbo231
Member
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 4:42 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

1960's engine wars

Post by Turbo231 »

After starting my post on Can Am engines, I started wondering about comparing the top engines from the 1960's and what their true potentials would be today. My list is:

Ford 427 SOHC
Ford 428 CJ
Ford Boss 429
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427

Say you have to use stock block and head castings and limit displacement to 430 cid. Fuel can be 110+ octane. Everything else is fair game including fixing any inherent oiling problems. Since this topic started with Can Am, all engines have to run mechanical fuel injection. Again, we are not building a drag race engine. We want something with longevity. Also, we will not worry about the engine weight and just look at power potential.

How would you rate these in order of power potential?
DanE1
New Member
New Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 9:22 am
Location:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by DanE1 »

SOHC 427 Ford
Boss 429 Ford
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427
428 CJ Ford
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4815
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by Stan Weiss »

Back in the day watching street racing. I show some 426 Hemi's get beaten by the 440 6 pack

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9841
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm
Location:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by pdq67 »

I have read that back in the day, an L-88 with no more than a good set of open headers was good for like 540hp!

And the still-born, LS-7, good for 600 hp.

There is information in the old HPBooks, "How to HR BBC's", book in the back if anybody is interested.

pdq67
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7633
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by PackardV8 »

DanE1 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:10 pm SOHC 427 Ford
Boss 429 Ford
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427
428 CJ Ford
Agree on your pure power potential ranking, but then we come to OP's "We want something with longevity." and the SOHC doesn't have it. Can't remember anyone running one in an endurance application, but I'd bet against the chain lasting very long.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Turbo231
Member
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed May 23, 2018 4:42 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by Turbo231 »

PackardV8 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:29 pm
DanE1 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:10 pm SOHC 427 Ford
Boss 429 Ford
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427
428 CJ Ford
Agree on your pure power potential ranking, but then we come to OP's "We want something with longevity." and the SOHC doesn't have it. Can't remember anyone running one in an endurance application, but I'd bet against the chain lasting very long.
Didn't Ford run the SOHC in NASCAR? I really can't remember.
ClassicComp
Expert
Expert
Posts: 933
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 10:50 pm
Location:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by ClassicComp »

Stan Weiss wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:20 pm Back in the day watching street racing. I show some 426 Hemi's get beaten by the 440 6 pack

Stan
Back in the day my father was the copilot of a fast 67 gto that wupped a tunnelport ford on norcom rd. But that's not endurance racing either.
results speak for themselves
427dart
Expert
Expert
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 3:23 pm
Location:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by 427dart »

Turbo231 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:37 pm
PackardV8 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:29 pm
DanE1 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:10 pm SOHC 427 Ford
Boss 429 Ford
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427
428 CJ Ford
Agree on your pure power potential ranking, but then we come to OP's "We want something with longevity." and the SOHC doesn't have it. Can't remember anyone running one in an endurance application, but I'd bet against the chain lasting very long.
Didn't Ford run the SOHC in NASCAR? I really can't remember.
The Cammer never got to run NASCAR because they put in a new rule to stop the use of special non production "toolroom" built engines.
Rules called for the engines to be available to the public in production cars and that's why the 1966 426 Street Hemi came to be.

Ford then used the Cammer in drag racing applications in the FX classes and later funny car and top fuel.

Now flash forward to today and look what special engines they run! Wish they would go back to the old rules!!
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by MadBill »

427dart wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm..The Cammer never got to run NASCAR because they put in a new rule to stop the use of special non production "toolroom" built engines.
Rules called for the engines to be available to the public in production cars and that's why the 1966 426 Street Hemi came to be....
Also the giant shoehorn-job of the Boss 429 Mustang... :shock:
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
427dart
Expert
Expert
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 3:23 pm
Location:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by 427dart »

MadBill wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:55 pm
427dart wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm..The Cammer never got to run NASCAR because they put in a new rule to stop the use of special non production "toolroom" built engines.
Rules called for the engines to be available to the public in production cars and that's why the 1966 426 Street Hemi came to be....
Also the giant shoehorn-job of the Boss 429 Mustang... :shock:
That was a strange move as it should have been available in the Torino and Cyclone since those were the cars running in NASCAR.
SupStk
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1913
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Box Elder, SD

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by SupStk »

427dart wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 7:39 pm
MadBill wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:55 pm
427dart wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:49 pm..The Cammer never got to run NASCAR because they put in a new rule to stop the use of special non production "toolroom" built engines.
Rules called for the engines to be available to the public in production cars and that's why the 1966 426 Street Hemi came to be....
Also the giant shoehorn-job of the Boss 429 Mustang... :shock:
That was a strange move as it should have been available in the Torino and Cyclone since those were the cars running in NASCAR.
Think the rules required engines to be available to the public in a certain quantity. No mention of what body they were to be installed in. Cars raced in NASCAR didn't resemble production pieces other than skin.
Monty Frerichs
B&M Machine
SupStk
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1913
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Box Elder, SD

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by SupStk »

Stan Weiss wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:20 pm Back in the day watching street racing. I show some 426 Hemi's get beaten by the 440 6 pack

Stan
Yup seen the same myself on more than a single occasion.
Monty Frerichs
B&M Machine
hoffman900
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:42 pm
Location:

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by hoffman900 »

SupStk wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 8:02 pm
Stan Weiss wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 12:20 pm Back in the day watching street racing. I show some 426 Hemi's get beaten by the 440 6 pack

Stan
Yup seen the same myself on more than a single occasion.
440 isn't 430cid :-?
-Bob
gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7622
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by gmrocket »

Turbo231 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:59 am After starting my post on Can Am engines, I started wondering about comparing the top engines from the 1960's and what their true potentials would be today. My list is:

Ford 427 SOHC
Ford 428 CJ
Ford Boss 429
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427

Say you have to use stock block and head castings and limit displacement to 430 cid. Fuel can be 110+ octane. Everything else is fair game including fixing any inherent oiling problems. Since this topic started with Can Am, all engines have to run mechanical fuel injection. Again, we are not building a drag race engine. We want something with longevity. Also, we will not worry about the engine weight and just look at power potential.

How would you rate these in order of power potential?
I think you can add Olds to that list...can am and the 455 69 H/O and 70 W30
gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7622
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: 1960's engine wars

Post by gmrocket »

gmrocket wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 9:31 pm
Turbo231 wrote: Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:59 am After starting my post on Can Am engines, I started wondering about comparing the top engines from the 1960's and what their true potentials would be today. My list is:

Ford 427 SOHC
Ford 428 CJ
Ford Boss 429
Chrysler Hemi 426
Chevy 427

Say you have to use stock block and head castings and limit displacement to 430 cid. Fuel can be 110+ octane. Everything else is fair game including fixing any inherent oiling problems. Since this topic started with Can Am, all engines have to run mechanical fuel injection. Again, we are not building a drag race engine. We want something with longevity. Also, we will not worry about the engine weight and just look at power potential.

How would you rate these in order of power potential?
I think you can add Olds to that list...can am and the 455 69 H/O and 70 W30
Oops, just noticed the 430" thing
Post Reply