GM -140 “off road” cam

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

travis
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1624
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:31 am
Location:

GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by travis »

I’ve got a NIB Crane “Blueprint” version of the GM -140 cam and lifters that I have been packing around for probably 20 years or more. This is a solid flat tappet cam and lifters, 257/269@.050, .493/.512 lift, 112 lsa.

Is this cam any good for anything? Particularly on a “hot street” pump gas 350 sbc with 4.10 or 4.56 gears and a 3500-ish stall converter? I was thinking maybe with some tweaked 062 vortecs and 1.6/1.5 rockers since they peak around .500” lift or so. Would 10.5-1 compression be too low for this?
Old School
Pro
Pro
Posts: 461
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 11:27 am
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by Old School »

travis wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 5:16 pm I’ve got a NIB Crane “Blueprint” version of the GM -140 cam and lifters that I have been packing around for probably 20 years or more. This is a solid flat tappet cam and lifters, 257/269@.050, .493/.512 lift, 112 lsa.

Is this cam any good for anything? Particularly on a “hot street” pump gas 350 sbc with 4.10 or 4.56 gears and a 3500-ish stall converter? I was thinking maybe with some tweaked 062 vortecs and 1.6/1.5 rockers since they peak around .500” lift or so. Would 10.5-1 compression be too low for this?
I did this years ago. The cam works better with a larger engine. Make it a 383, the more compression the better. We did a 383 with an LT 1 piston, (L2304 ??) I think was the TRW number, 400 rods, and 292 heads. It ran high 11's in a 3200 lb car 25 years ago, street driven.
427dart
Expert
Expert
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 3:23 pm
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by 427dart »

Back in 1974 I stuck one in my new Z/2B Camaro L-82 . Now at same time I added the then new Angle Plug heads,aluminum LT-1 intake and headers.
Think I had maybe 9.5-10.1 compression with those heads and with a 4 speed it didn't do much but sounded nasty as hell!
Also I was running a pair of original Chevy Corvair Turbo mufflers I got from a dealer. Those things sounded really good!
rustbucket79
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:23 pm
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by rustbucket79 »

That cam is a horsepower delete compared to anything made within 20 years of today and remotely better "spec'd" than that cam. Do yourself a huge favour and sell it on EBay.
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9829
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

Yes it will work well. Lots of gear, convertrr and cr.
Might try advancing it a bit more on install for more torque. Say 105-106 in c/l.
Use correct springs if jacking up the rr.
Big single plan 750+ lots of rpm

Can also be a mean superchsrger cam

As said may be able to sell trade it for a better csm match.

If yiu can get a 5000 stall race converter and 4.88+ go for it. It likes rpm.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10718
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by CamKing »

travis wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 5:16 pm Is this cam any good for anything?
Yes, a door stop.
Too much duration, not enough lift.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3256
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by Tuner »

The 140 cam has been winning races for more than 50 years. Isn't less duration and more lift harder on parts? How do they work with higher ratio rockers?
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9829
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

Tuner wrote: Tue Feb 26, 2019 11:52 am The 140 cam has been winning races for more than 50 years. Isn't less duration and more lift harder on parts? How do they work with higher ratio rockers?
This cam works great with higher rr. The lobes were origionally used on the BBC 427 L88 with 1.7 rr.
fdicrasto
Expert
Expert
Posts: 780
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:44 pm
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by fdicrasto »

That cam was often called an "optional Z-28" cam. In its day it was a huge improvement over the original solid cam in the 302" Z-28. You had to use the orange valve springs Chevy offered for it specifically for the early Trans Am racing series. As previously stated it was suspiciously similar to the first design L-88 cam specs. Smokey even did a 1.7:1 rocker stud and rocker arm modification sheet for this combo besides his working with Chevy to design the dual carb crossram intake manifold for this package. I remember well when Dan Fletcher's dad took delivery of his 69 Z-28 and in the trunk was the crossram, tube headers and I believe the cam package right from Chevrolet. Cool times for us gear heads back then.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10718
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by CamKing »

Tuner wrote: Tue Feb 26, 2019 11:52 am The 140 cam has been winning races for more than 50 years. Isn't less duration and more lift harder on parts? How do they work with higher ratio rockers?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

It's at least 20hp and 20ft/lbs down from an average race cam, from the last decade.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9829
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

This cam can and will work really really well in your planed 350. With Nitrous Oxide Injection.

You will really see what this cam is capable of.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by MadBill »

427dart wrote: Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:58 pm Back in 1974 I stuck one in my new Z/2B Camaro L-82 . Now at same time I added the then new Angle Plug heads,aluminum LT-1 intake and headers.
Think I had maybe 9.5-10.1 compression with those heads and with a 4 speed it didn't do much but sounded nasty as hell!
Also I was running a pair of original Chevy Corvair Turbo mufflers I got from a dealer. Those things sounded really good!
Guess we have something in common Dart. I put a 140 cam in my new '70 Z28, along with a cross ram, milled, ported and angle plug-converted factory heads (~12:1), headers 3" side dumps with caps and Corvair turbo mufflers.

Cam got sliced and diced by an errant con rod not long after.. :(
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6390
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by Walter R. Malik »

The only positive thing I see with this cam today is that it will work with marginally soft valve springs using a 1.65/1 rocker arm.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
DSRE388
New Member
New Member
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:56 pm
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by DSRE388 »

That's one of those factory racing parts like cross ram intakes and 292 turbo heads that were pretty awesome back in the 70's and it makes for a cool conversation piece or if you were trying to build a vintage race motor using factory parts i can see why you would use it but man you could probably throw a dart at a cam catalog and make a lot more power with whatever it hit lol jk!
I believe in maximizing whatever you are building to get the most for the money you invest but hey im sure it would still work just nowhere near what we have available today, jm2
rp930
Pro
Pro
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:47 pm
Location:

Re: GM -140 “off road” cam

Post by rp930 »

Is that the old Phase 3 cam? Or was there such a thing?
Post Reply