Reduced low lift flow from porting...

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
Warp Speed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3285
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Warp Speed »

midnightbluS10 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:19 pm
Warp Speed wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:39 pm
SpeierRacingHeads wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:27 pm

I have no reason to talk about it??? It's been talked about to death, let it go.

I'm saying not everything needs a 50 degree.

Your the one that wants to argue about it.

I brought that up because I service his heads, he won, he's fast, and it proves not everything needs a 50.

I care too much? It's my living.

Poke my chest out? I gave an example. You are the problem Jay, period.
I'm the problem?!? Lol
I want to talk about the whys and how, you refuse.
Welcome back, the same old Chad!
The way you approach the situation is part of the problem. It's like you want to be argumentative. It's like you enjoy being combative. Especially towards people you disagree with.
Do you have anything technical to add?
I knew exactly how this thread was gonna go from the start, and here we go.....
Warp Speed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3285
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Warp Speed »

Charliesauto wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:21 pm
SpeierRacingHeads wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:01 pm I have 3 different sets of heads in the shop with 60 degree seat.

I recently had some DRCE PS heads in the shop, no 60 there..

I feel I can make as much power with a 45 as I can with a 50 with my 23 degree stuff. Most of the Comp, big valve sportsman, are all 50 degree.

My 265cc 23 degree has a 50 degree seat.

These aren't some catalog cutters I use. I'll also say all of my 45 cutters have a 40 or more top cut. 35 is old news. :)
At this very moment, I am looking at a set of NASCAR SB2.2 heads from a many time championship team, they are 60 degree exhaust, probably 13-14 year old stuff.
Whenever the valve seat angle comes up, the exhaust is rarely referenced. I wonder why? Lol
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by GARY C »

Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:47 am
midnightbluS10 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:19 pm
Warp Speed wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:39 pm

I'm the problem?!? Lol
I want to talk about the whys and how, you refuse.
Welcome back, the same old Chad!
The way you approach the situation is part of the problem. It's like you want to be argumentative. It's like you enjoy being combative. Especially towards people you disagree with.
Do you have anything technical to add?
I knew exactly how this thread was gonna go from the start, and here we go.....
What are the flow #'s on a cup car head and what is it at TDC? Just so we can keep this a tech discussion?
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by GARY C »

Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:54 am
Charliesauto wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:21 pm
SpeierRacingHeads wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:01 pm I have 3 different sets of heads in the shop with 60 degree seat.

I recently had some DRCE PS heads in the shop, no 60 there..

I feel I can make as much power with a 45 as I can with a 50 with my 23 degree stuff. Most of the Comp, big valve sportsman, are all 50 degree.

My 265cc 23 degree has a 50 degree seat.

These aren't some catalog cutters I use. I'll also say all of my 45 cutters have a 40 or more top cut. 35 is old news. :)
At this very moment, I am looking at a set of NASCAR SB2.2 heads from a many time championship team, they are 60 degree exhaust, probably 13-14 year old stuff.
Whenever the valve seat angle comes up, the exhaust is rarely referenced. I wonder why? Lol
I ask the same thing every time the discussion is brought up, with no answer... So fill us in?
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
Warp Speed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3285
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Warp Speed »

GARY C wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:19 am
Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:47 am
midnightbluS10 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 6:19 pm

The way you approach the situation is part of the problem. It's like you want to be argumentative. It's like you enjoy being combative. Especially towards people you disagree with.
Do you have anything technical to add?
I knew exactly how this thread was gonna go from the start, and here we go.....
What are the flow #'s on a cup car head and what is it at TDC? Just so we can keep this a tech discussion?
I obviously can't tell you exactly what our heads flow, but it's not uncommon to see a Cup head go 440+cfm. Not sure what you are referring to as far as TDC?
Warp Speed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3285
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Warp Speed »

GARY C wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:21 am
Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:54 am
Charliesauto wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:21 pm

At this very moment, I am looking at a set of NASCAR SB2.2 heads from a many time championship team, they are 60 degree exhaust, probably 13-14 year old stuff.
Whenever the valve seat angle comes up, the exhaust is rarely referenced. I wonder why? Lol
I ask the same thing every time the discussion is brought up, with no answer... So fill us in?
I dont have an answer, except maybe most think it is unimportant?!? Lol
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4815
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Stan Weiss »

Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:11 am
GARY C wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:19 am
Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:47 am

Do you have anything technical to add?
I knew exactly how this thread was gonna go from the start, and here we go.....
What are the flow #'s on a cup car head and what is it at TDC? Just so we can keep this a tech discussion?
I obviously can't tell you exactly what our heads flow, but it's not uncommon to see a Cup head go 440+cfm. Not sure what you are referring to as far as TDC?
Jay,
You take the intake valve lift @ TDC and see what the head has for flow at that lift.

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Ron E
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2085
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 9:35 pm
Location: nc

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Ron E »

We like 55° seats on the exhaust in almost any drag race application that is freshened yearly or more. The 55 allows a touch more duration giving increased duration at meaningful lifts. It works with big throats which helps make the port quieter. And, the higher lifts (subsonic) usually are better with steeper seats.
PRH
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:16 pm
Location: S. Burlington, Vt.

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by PRH »

SpeierRacingHeads wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:10 pm
BradH wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 10:29 pm
SpeierRacingHeads wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:01 pm ... I'll also say all of my 45 cutters have a 40 or more top cut. 35 is old news. :)
Can you comment on what you want to see as a transition from that type of top angle into the chamber?
Here are a couple pictures of a 15 degree Ford with a 40 top 50 and a 23 degree Dart with a 40 top 50. Same cutter. Then the third picture is a 40 top 45. I want to not feel any transition.

Image

Image

Image
What do you do when the shape of the chambers are not anything “race inspired”, where there will definitely be a large portion of the perimeter of the valve seat that has to transition to a “0” deg area?
Like a Performer RPM for a BB Mopar....... or a factory Pontiac machined chamber.

Without sinking the valve a bunch, there simply isn’t enough material to work with to transition from a 40* top cut to the 0* chamber so you can’t feel it.

Like with that 305 stocker head......... which doesn’t have a 40* top cut.
Somewhat handy with a die grinder.
PRH
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:16 pm
Location: S. Burlington, Vt.

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by PRH »

Thats interesting, my 10.2 Chevy 2.05 headed 350 with a 262 XE vs my 9.2 Factory Pontiac 2.11 headed 412 with a 268 AH have almost the same overlap, 54/56 respectivly but my Pontiac is a bit more radical at idle at 2" lower in vacuum and requires at least 150 more rpm to idle despite being 62 ci bigger? both with 1.65 rockers an around .511 lift and similar head work around 240 CFM?
Sounds like you have the perfect opportunity to see just what losing some low lift flow by changing the valve seat angle will do to the power output if you change nothing else.

Put some 45* intake valves in the Pontiac heads and I’m sure you’ll be rewarded with higher idle vacuum.
Will that translate into additional power?
That’s the answer this test should provide........ and is at the root on the OP’s original question.

On a mild street combo like that........ is losing low lift flow a bad thing?
Last edited by PRH on Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Somewhat handy with a die grinder.
SpeierRacingHeads
Vendor
Posts: 943
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
Location: KS
Contact:

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by SpeierRacingHeads »

PRH wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:33 am
SpeierRacingHeads wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 11:10 pm
BradH wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 10:29 pm
Can you comment on what you want to see as a transition from that type of top angle into the chamber?
Here are a couple pictures of a 15 degree Ford with a 40 top 50 and a 23 degree Dart with a 40 top 50. Same cutter. Then the third picture is a 40 top 45. I want to not feel any transition.

Image

Image

Image
What do you do when the shape of the chambers are not anything “race inspired”, where there will definitely be a large portion of the perimeter of the valve seat that has to transition to a “0” deg area?
Like a Performer RPM for a BB Mopar....... or a factory Pontiac machined chamber.

Without sinking the valve a bunch, there simply isn’t enough material to work with to transition from a 40* top cut to the 0* chamber so you can’t feel it.

Like with that 305 stocker head......... which doesn’t have a 40* top cut.
Your right, I put whatever top cut the chamber can take. But I will say, I don't work on too much factory stuff anymore.

I have a local, good friend, that runs a crate engine in his dirt mod at the local track. I didn't have a cutter. So I busted out the stones! :)

The stocker head was stones as well.
Speier Racing Heads
Chad Speier
785-623-0963
PRH
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1502
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 4:16 pm
Location: S. Burlington, Vt.

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by PRH »

I put whatever top cut the chamber can take.
This is the core of my arguments about a lot of stuff that gets tossed around in forums.

Not all heads and/or combinations are suitable candidates to try and implement the latest trends being used on the newest, most advanced castings currently available.

And that point is often not talked about.
Last edited by PRH on Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:57 am, edited 2 times in total.
Somewhat handy with a die grinder.
RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5646
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am
Location:

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by RevTheory »

PRH wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:48 am
I put whatever top cut the chamber can take.
This is the core of my arguments about a lot of stuff that gets tossed around in forums.

Not all heads and/or combinations are suitable candidates to try and implement the latest trends being used on the newest, most advanced castings currently available.

And that point is often not talked about.
I couldn't agree more. Well said.
SpeierRacingHeads
Vendor
Posts: 943
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
Location: KS
Contact:

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by SpeierRacingHeads »

PRH wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 10:48 am
I put whatever top cut the chamber can take.
This is the core of my arguments about a lot of stuff that gets tossed around in forums.

Not all heads and/or combinations are suitable candidates to try and implement the latest trends being used on the newest, most advanced castings currently available.

And that point is often not talked about.
I agree. What kills me is guys read that you need "this" or "that" seat and end up putting the wrong top cut on it and killing the head.
Speier Racing Heads
Chad Speier
785-623-0963
Warp Speed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3285
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Reduced low lift flow from porting...

Post by Warp Speed »

Stan Weiss wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 9:55 am
Warp Speed wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 7:11 am
GARY C wrote: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:19 am
What are the flow #'s on a cup car head and what is it at TDC? Just so we can keep this a tech discussion?
I obviously can't tell you exactly what our heads flow, but it's not uncommon to see a Cup head go 440+cfm. Not sure what you are referring to as far as TDC?
Jay,
You take the intake valve lift @ TDC and see what the head has for flow at that lift.

Stan
What is learned by this and how is it applied?
Post Reply