Hahaha, your to much!ClassAct wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:56 pmWarp Speed wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 4:59 pm60* on #1 cyl?zums wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:55 pm
I think what ClassAct is basically trying to say when comparing oiling systems is that the SBC picks its feed up from the main and oils the rod jrl at around the TDC visinity before the load is the greatest on compression, that spreads the wedge and also gets the rod feed hole out of the way, im not familiar with Chrysler systems but this "timing" as everyone eludes to is 60* on a SBC
Tom
What about #2?
You see, what Classass fails to realize, is that we (or many besides him anyway) have learned thing a thing or two about oiling systems, and busted many myths since the "good old days"! Lol
We use some oil timing strategies ( for various reasons) that according to his vast knowledge, wouldn't make it past 6k, but is successful at 9k+, with oil temps in the 280*+ in range, depression levels well over 20in (anyone with real experience know what depression does to hot oil) making well over his 2hp/ci level, all day long. Hell, our holes weren't "lined up at 70* atdc, turning 10,400, all day long!
Why is that, if this is all just simply a timing thing?!?
MT brought up a case with a mod motor. Not sure what the timing problem was in the crank that caused his failure, and he stated that they were drilled wrong? But in a 90* v8, with a single, straight shot drill (as the stock crank is) there is only so far you could adjust the oil timing. And the only aftermarket crank that is available for them is from Manley, and they employ a stock, oem drilling, and thus timing. One bank oils at one point, and the other oils basicslly 90 or so after, just like a sbc, ls, sbf ect.
We have the ability to use complex drillings in our design, so basically can adjust this timing all over the place, and have, for various reasons along the way. That's how I know what I speak. LOTS of scientific testing at extreme rpm and temps, with little biudries other than extreme architectural.
Again, not beating my chest what so ever..................just stating Facts!
Is the placement and angle of the block main feed in a 351c optimum? Hell no, but neither is the 351w (almost identical to the 351c) and they don't exhibit this problem.........why?!?
This Is NOT just a simple hydraulic system, but a very complex and inefficient one, no matter what some may imply
I see...you don't agree so you call me names. That makes you a pussy because you wouldn't say that to my face.
I understand that you don't know this so I must be wrong, and this is your way to get Mike to lock a thread which you can't dominate.
You are classLESS.
You can dish it out, but then can't take being wrong, so you want to act tough!
Your in way over your head here, but you know that huh?!?