Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

6.50camaro
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 596
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2017 2:24 pm
Location: Summer Shade, Ky

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by 6.50camaro »

IMHO, Cranes advising higher copmression is not a result of tighter centerline put of overall intake duration and later closing off intake . The tighter centerline is to keep the exhaust from opening to early because they always think you need more exhaust duration than intake . The degree of overlap is just a result of that ,thats all . Dan
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by Belgian1979 »

I tend to agree with Mike. I don't think that a tighter LSA needs a higher CR. I do believe that a tighter lsa creates a higher compression pressure since, all other variables kept the same, the intake valve would close at less degrees ABDC.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by CamKing »

In circle track racing, there are a bunch of classes, where the engine rules are almost identical, but some are limited to lower compression.
These classes run the same size engines, heads, manifold, Carb, and turn the same RPM. The lower the compression the tighter the LSA and ICL needs to be.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
n2omike
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Location: West Virginia

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by n2omike »

As was said... All else being equal, the tighter LSA closes the intake valve sooner, which traps more air... providing a higher dynamic compression ratio.

Saying a tight LSA requires more compression is a statement from out in left field, and totally backwards.

My theory on why the catalog says that, is that you're looking at cams for two completely different applications. A STREET cam (wider LSA) needs to be run on pump gas, so it will recommend a lower CR. A more serious cam made for racing... where straight pump gas may not be required... will bend that recommendation towards a higher compression ratio for max power.

Regardless of whether or not you're comparing street and race cams, catalogs are not perfect. They get parts added, they get edited... and are not 100% consistent. They're not exactly a valid scientific resource.

Good Luck
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by Belgian1979 »

I always read that the higher CR recommended for some cams is due to the reduced compression pressure and therefore lost power when using cams with longer duration. So the longer the duration, the higher the CR is the recover some of the lost power which is caused by less trapped air at the end of the compression stroke. This in itself doesn't explain what octane fuel you need imo although it might be an indication imo.
n2omike
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Location: West Virginia

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by n2omike »

Belgian1979 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 1:56 pm I always read that the higher CR recommended for some cams is due to the reduced compression pressure and therefore lost power when using cams with longer duration. So the longer the duration, the higher the CR is the recover some of the lost power which is caused by less trapped air at the end of the compression stroke. This in itself doesn't explain what octane fuel you need imo although it might be an indication imo.
Yes... Hence the 'all else being equal' statement at the beginning of my reply above.

In response to your query... all else being equal... The longer the intake duration, the later the valve closes during the compression stroke, and the less air it traps to be compressed. To make up for this, the longer the intake duration, the higher the compression ratio needs to be in order to maintain good cylinder pressure.

Longer Duration = Higher Compression Ratio Needed
Wider lobe separation = Higher Compression Ratio Needed
Lizardracing
Pro
Pro
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 2:38 am
Location:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by Lizardracing »

I'm just here to complain about the word "dynamic compression" when IVC is actually a mechanical thing that CANNOT change therefor isn't dynamic at all but instead STATIC!

Climbing down now.

Carry on using the wrong terminology if you wish.
lc-gtr-1969
Member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:12 pm
Location:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by lc-gtr-1969 »

Lizardracing wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:03 pm I'm just here to complain about the word "dynamic compression" when IVC is actually a mechanical thing that CANNOT change therefor isn't dynamic at all but instead STATIC!

Climbing down now.

Carry on using the wrong terminology if you wish.
Hmmm... No, cannot say I agree here. Static compression is the mathematical caluclation of the compression ratio, compressed volume... Dynamic is in reference to cylinder pressure within the moving engine. The two are different... The intake valve closing angle bleeds off some of the air column (in a running engine), hence 2 engines with the same mathematically derived compression ratio (static) will have different operating cylinder pressures at fixed rpm if they have different cam specs (ie one with 106lsa installed at 104 will have higher cylinder pressure than a 112lsa installed at 110, presuming the same duration and static compression). This is why the answer to the OP question is that tighter LSA does not need more compression. When duration is the same, if you widen the LSA you should raise the comrpession ratio accordingly to match the later intake closing angle and subsequent intake bleed off.

Happy to be proven wrong here, maybe i've been getting it wrong all these years...
Fumbling around in the shed...
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by GARY C »

lc-gtr-1969 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:34 pm
Lizardracing wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:03 pm I'm just here to complain about the word "dynamic compression" when IVC is actually a mechanical thing that CANNOT change therefor isn't dynamic at all but instead STATIC!

Climbing down now.

Carry on using the wrong terminology if you wish.
Hmmm... No, cannot say I agree here. Static compression is the mathematical caluclation of the compression ratio, compressed volume... Dynamic is in reference to cylinder pressure within the moving engine. The two are different... The intake valve closing angle bleeds off some of the air column (in a running engine), hence 2 engines with the same mathematically derived compression ratio (static) will have different operating cylinder pressures at fixed rpm if they have different cam specs (ie one with 106lsa installed at 104 will have higher cylinder pressure than a 112lsa installed at 110, presuming the same duration and static compression). This is why the answer to the OP question is that tighter LSA does not need more compression. When duration is the same, if you widen the LSA you should raise the comrpession ratio accordingly to match the later intake closing angle and subsequent intake bleed off.

Happy to be proven wrong here, maybe i've been getting it wrong all these years...
That and it can be adjusted via installed ICL plus it changes with RPM where compression ratio is fixed.
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
plovett
Expert
Expert
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Kansas City

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by plovett »

lc-gtr-1969 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:34 pm
Dynamic is in reference to cylinder pressure within the moving engine.
This is not correct. Dynamic compression ratio does not refer to the actual cylinder pressure in a running engine. What you are talking about is "actual cylinder pressure in a running engine." DCR is just static compression ratio based on the stroke when the intake valve closes.

paulie
77cruiser
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: I Falls MN
Contact:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by 77cruiser »

Maybe the term just needs to be changed from DCR to IVCCR. :idea:
Jim
lc-gtr-1969
Member
Member
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 3:12 pm
Location:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by lc-gtr-1969 »

plovett wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 5:04 pm
lc-gtr-1969 wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 4:34 pm
Dynamic is in reference to cylinder pressure within the moving engine.
This is not correct. Dynamic compression ratio does not refer to the actual cylinder pressure in a running engine. What you are talking about is "actual cylinder pressure in a running engine." DCR is just static compression ratio based on the stroke when the intake valve closes.

paulie
I think my choice of words and phrasing could have, actually, should have been clearer but notice I said 'reference to', not measurement of? Whilst you can (and we do) calculate dynamic compression theoretically, it is in an attempt to predict what happens regarding cylinder pressure in a moving engine, ie to give a reference point to show how different IVC events impact upon the 'effective' compression ratio compared to true static compression ratio.

Nonetheless, it's a helpful prediction of the effective compression an engine will see as it is attempting to account for the bleed-off that occurs from the IVCA. The word dynamic may be misleading but it is the accepted industry term, even though it is not measuring 'actual' compression but rather its a theoretical reference, still something I use.
Fumbling around in the shed...
Steve.k
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 10:41 am
Location:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by Steve.k »

The tighter lsa is more often used where theres a lack of oxygen or higher Da where you need to build cylinder pressure quickly. This would also apply to smaller cube higher output engines. In our low oxygen area i typically run 102-106 lobe sep on 351-400 cubes. On the bigger cube engines that do not have as much tq defeciency I’ll go wider.
plovett
Expert
Expert
Posts: 871
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Kansas City

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by plovett »

77cruiser wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 5:12 pm Maybe the term just needs to be changed from DCR to IVCCR. :idea:
Yes, the name DCR is unfortunate as it is misleading. I was thinking CACR, Cam Adjusted Compression Ratio.
77cruiser
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: I Falls MN
Contact:

Re: Why does a tighter lsa need more compression?

Post by 77cruiser »

plovett wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 7:16 pm
77cruiser wrote: Fri Feb 07, 2020 5:12 pm Maybe the term just needs to be changed from DCR to IVCCR. :idea:
Yes, the name DCR is unfortunate as it is misleading. I was thinking CACR, Cam Adjusted Compression Ratio.
It works.
Jim
Post Reply