Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

n2omike
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Location: West Virginia

Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by n2omike »

Brand new engine
Dart Sportsman 8.2 Ford block
4340 Scat Crank
Oliver Rods
7800 rpm

Double checked my clearances, and also verified with Plasti-gage. 0.002" on the mains, and that is using Clevite MS-590 HX 'extra clearance' bearings that are supposed to give an extra 0.001". Crank mics out to 2.2490". Ideal is 2.2480".

What should I do? 0.002" seems a little tight.

Thanks
RW TECH
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2398
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:08 pm
Location: DETROIT, MI

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by RW TECH »

The only way that would ever be a problem is if something or another is not straight, round, stuff, and smooth.

I've dealt with 2.750" main combinations (larger than 302 - BBC, 351C/SVO) and usually targeted .0019"-.0023" for main bearing clearance in severe off-road truck racing applications with 4" stroke at 8500-ish peak RPM for 15 minutes per race, about a dozen per season.

I've also done this on 1100 HP 4.5" stroke BBC turning 7800 trap RPM.

I don't think I'd worry about .002" on a 2.25" main. That's likely to be where similar size NASCAR engines are built to.
n2omike
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Location: West Virginia

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by n2omike »

RW TECH wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 3:04 pm The only way that would ever be a problem is if something or another is not straight, round, stuff, and smooth.

I've dealt with 2.750" main combinations (larger than 302 - BBC, 351C/SVO) and usually targeted .0019"-.0023" for main bearing clearance in severe off-road truck racing applications with 4" stroke at 8500-ish peak RPM for 15 minutes per race, about a dozen per season.

I've also done this on 1100 HP 4.5" stroke BBC turning 7800 trap RPM.

I don't think I'd worry about .002" on a 2.25" main. That's likely to be where similar size NASCAR engines are built to.
Yea, the tighter the clearance, the less room there is for error. In an absolutely perfect world, that clearance would likely work... especially with something thinner than the Mobil 1 15w50 I normally run... and the crank is 4340, but Scat, not a Crower or something.

I called my machinist, and he mentioned Shaft Tech in Findlay, OH... which is about a 4.5 hour drive. No reliable crank grinders around here, anymore. He said they have a $30k machine that can reliably polish off 0.001", and make things perfect. Of course, they charge $400 just to turn one.

Another option is to get a new crank. This one is internally balanced. It was done close to 10 years ago, back before any internally balanced cranks were available, so it's got a few slugs of Mallory. Anyway, it's got a 1502 gram bob weight. (Oliver extra light rods and Mahle pistons) Looking into what is available under $1k that comes highly recommended. (4340 forged, internally balanced with a 3.4" stroke)

I'm just not comfortable with 0.002" clearance. It took me a long time to acquire all the parts for this engine, and I can't take any chances on doing something unwise that might kill it.
piston guy
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1029
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 1:55 pm
Location: Anaheim, CA

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by piston guy »

I would have Adney Brown at Performance Crankshaft in Detroit ( only another hour more) grind it . SUPER quality work. "Realistic" prices.
n2omike
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Location: West Virginia

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by n2omike »

piston guy wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 4:13 pm I would have Adney Brown at Performance Crankshaft in Detroit ( only another hour more) grind it . SUPER quality work. "Realistic" prices.
Thanks. I'm in WV... so nothing is all that close. I did call Shaft Tech, who comes HIGHLY recommended by my machinist. They said to take 0.001" off the mains and re-harden the shaft was $340. If they did the rods as well, it was $425... and about a 4 week turnaround.

I miss the days of having a GOOD reliable crank grinder an hour away, who you could simply take the crank there and have it ground to the 'low' side of the spec for $120... and have it back in a couple days. Heck, there were two places right close to each other who both did excellent work. Now, only one is there... and the old guys who use to do the work have long since retired. The quality/precision isn't near what it use to be. GOOD machinists are few and far between, anymore.

I don't feel comfortable shipping a crank both ways, as I don't want it to get bent/damaged... and it's too far to drive... twice.

My machinist is a dealer for Callies, and is seeing what he can get a Compstar for.
n2omike
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Location: West Virginia

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by n2omike »

Okay... Looks like I found an alternative.

My machinist said he could get a Compstar for $781 plus $50 freight, and would balance it for $175... but also referred me to a man named Rod McBride in Fresno, OH. McBride Crankshaft. He works from his home, is very experienced, and has a good reputation. I called him on the phone, and he said he has a micro-polisher... not a belt... that will accurately remove between a half thou to a thou of material, putting me right where I need to be. He reiterated that a belt would would be a bad idea, but his machine could fix it right up. I believe he said it was around $100... and turnaround was about a week... and it's about a 2.5 hour trip, which is do-able. Crankshafts are all he does. He also has reasonable prices to turn a crank.

McBride Crankshaft
(330) 204-5571
Charliesauto
Pro
Pro
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 2:01 am
Location:

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by Charliesauto »

n2omike wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:58 pm Brand new engine
Dart Sportsman 8.2 Ford block
4340 Scat Crank
Oliver Rods
7800 rpm

Double checked my clearances, and also verified with Plasti-gage. 0.002" on the mains, and that is using Clevite MS-590 HX 'extra clearance' bearings that are supposed to give an extra 0.001". Crank mics out to 2.2490". Ideal is 2.2480".

What should I do? 0.002" seems a little tight.

Thanks
Buy a set of ACL 5M590HX bearings if you want more clearance than the Clevites. That being said, I have ran .0018"-.0020" on SBF circle track engines with 302 main size and over 800HP with zero issues.

I would not consider letting someone polish .001" from a crank, no matter what kind of polishing apparatus they have.
vortecpro
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1801
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:10 pm
Location:

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by vortecpro »

This easily fixed.........you sand the back of the bearing counting sand strokes. You want to sand the bottom 1/3 of the radius, so as too increase the vertical clearance. This is done all the time. Of course you want to CK clearance with a Sunnen bore gauge. You can easily get 4 tenths......easy.
Racing a NA NHRA stocker should be mandatory before any posting.
SupStk
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1913
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Box Elder, SD

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by SupStk »

Another vote for Adney Brown. That guy is a magician with a crank grinder and this is from someone who grinds cranks.
Monty Frerichs
B&M Machine
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6387
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by Walter R. Malik »

n2omike wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 2:58 pm Brand new engine
Dart Sportsman 8.2 Ford block
4340 Scat Crank
Oliver Rods
7800 rpm

Double checked my clearances, and also verified with Plasti-gage. 0.002" on the mains, and that is using Clevite MS-590 HX 'extra clearance' bearings that are supposed to give an extra 0.001". Crank mics out to 2.2490". Ideal is 2.2480".

What should I do? 0.002" seems a little tight.

Thanks
That main journal is only 2.249" maximum...? With a 4340 crank, Run it; (unless there is shoddy machine work).

Low limit dimension is 2.2482" and 2.2490" is the high limit.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
xanadu
Pro
Pro
Posts: 372
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:41 am
Location: Brisbane Australia

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by xanadu »

I used to be a bit weary on tighter clearances. With quality products and machine work, i now shoot for them.
0.002" will be fine IMO.
Mark O'Neal
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1649
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:23 pm
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Contact:

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by Mark O'Neal »

Polish the crank?
Mark O'Neal
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1649
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 7:23 pm
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Contact:

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by Mark O'Neal »

vortecpro wrote: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:15 pm This easily fixed.........you sand the back of the bearing counting sand strokes. You want to sand the bottom 1/3 of the radius, so as too increase the vertical clearance. This is done all the time. Of course you want to CK clearance with a Sunnen bore gauge. You can easily get 4 tenths......easy.
That is easy.

I caught one of my engine builders doing that one time. I fired him on the spot.
tuffxf
Pro
Pro
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:34 am
Location: Central Qld Australia

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by tuffxf »

Gday,
Try a different brand, acl or king, I would rather use acl or clevite but king are usually looser and have a great range of sizes
If you are going to attack the crank do it properly , get a good crank grinder don’t try to polish those amounts
Cheers
Momus
Pro
Pro
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:38 am
Location:

Re: Unsure what to do with 0.0020" Main Clearance

Post by Momus »

Run it. Will be fine.

At the moment with all the crap there could be a logistics issue sending it out or any number of QA adverse possibilities
trying to correct such a small error.
Post Reply