Connecting Rod Tech.
Moderator: Team
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:54 pm
- Location: central Florida
Connecting Rod Tech.
I will start by saying that I don’t want this topic to turn into a big argument about different beam designs, now my question at hand is In a 90 degree V-8 engine such as ( or similar to ) a NASCAR cup engine ( excluding the bolts ) what are the most highly stressed specific points of the rod and or the cap ? Thanks to any body who can give factual input, Mark H.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:37 pm
- Location:
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
Under tension, I’d say each rod section could be evaluated by the total piston assembly and rod section mass divided by the cross-sectional area of that rod section. So it depends on the rod design.
Paradigms often shift without the clutch -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxn-LxwsrnU
https://www.instagram.com/ptuomov/
Put Search Keywords Here
https://www.instagram.com/ptuomov/
Put Search Keywords Here
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
AFAIK FEA only allows a single input in 1 plane = 1 test each for tension and compression.
The actual stress on each molecule of the rod depends in part on its vector.
In common understanding, the pin eye is subjected only to reciprocating forces, but the entire eye (and pin bushing, pin) also oscillates, with the top of the eye in direct opposition to the beam below the pin.
In similar complex fashion, each successive molecule down the length of the beam toward the crank begins to add a rotating load to it reciprocation, with the big end almost pure rotation (again, the bottom of the rod opposing the beam terminating in the big end).
However: the crank rotation acts both with and against rod big end rotation.
These factors suggest that rod ratio (and pin offset, where present) must be included in any simulation.
Tough question, impossible to quantify inputs TIKO.
The actual stress on each molecule of the rod depends in part on its vector.
In common understanding, the pin eye is subjected only to reciprocating forces, but the entire eye (and pin bushing, pin) also oscillates, with the top of the eye in direct opposition to the beam below the pin.
In similar complex fashion, each successive molecule down the length of the beam toward the crank begins to add a rotating load to it reciprocation, with the big end almost pure rotation (again, the bottom of the rod opposing the beam terminating in the big end).
However: the crank rotation acts both with and against rod big end rotation.
These factors suggest that rod ratio (and pin offset, where present) must be included in any simulation.
Tough question, impossible to quantify inputs TIKO.
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
https://nasaspeed.news/tech/engine/conn ... d-physics/“From what I’ve seen, the transitions between the beam and the big end and where the beam transitions to the small end, those two radii there definitely see the most stress in most of the cases I’ve looked at,” Stothers said.
Paradigms often shift without the clutch -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxn-LxwsrnU
https://www.instagram.com/ptuomov/
Put Search Keywords Here
https://www.instagram.com/ptuomov/
Put Search Keywords Here
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
FEA can simulate anything you want but the complexity and time goes up exponentially therefore most people break it down into a more manageable practical analysis that gives 98% of the answers to drive the engineering.panic wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 7:56 pm AFAIK FEA only allows a single input in 1 plane = 1 test each for tension and compression.
The actual stress on each molecule of the rod depends in part on its vector.
In common understanding, the pin eye is subjected only to reciprocating forces, but the entire eye (and pin bushing, pin) also oscillates, with the top of the eye in direct opposition to the beam below the pin.
In similar complex fashion, each successive molecule down the length of the beam toward the crank begins to add a rotating load to it reciprocation, with the big end almost pure rotation (again, the bottom of the rod opposing the beam terminating in the big end).
However: the crank rotation acts both with and against rod big end rotation.
These factors suggest that rod ratio (and pin offset, where present) must be included in any simulation.
Tough question, impossible to quantify inputs TIKO.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:15 am
- Location: Gold Canyon, AZ
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
It is commonly stated that a connecting rod goes through the most stress as the piston goes through TDC on the exhaust stroke. Most high performance rod manufacturers should be able to provide you with test results that compare 'H' beam and 'I' beam rods, as well as various cap designs and rod bolt nomenclature.
Bill
Perfect Circle Doctor of Motors certification
SAE Member (30 years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist (+ two otherASE Master Certifications)
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist
Perfect Circle Doctor of Motors certification
SAE Member (30 years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist (+ two otherASE Master Certifications)
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
Actually most engines the compressive rod stresses way out do the tensile stresses. Not the cases with an nascar rpm levels though.engineguyBill wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:44 pm It is commonly stated that a connecting rod goes through the most stress as the piston goes through TDC on the exhaust stroke. Most high performance rod manufacturers should be able to provide you with test results that compare 'H' beam and 'I' beam rods, as well as various cap designs and rod bolt nomenclature.
The answer to the op question is depends on the exact rod geometry the transition rod little or big end to beam transition or the spot face under the bolt head on the cap are areas that show hot spots. You see many cheap rods with garbage cap geometry near the bolt spit gave yet these rods have been fea’d lol
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:54 pm
- Location: central Florida
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
Digger please define the meaning of the word fea'd , excuse me if i seem dumb, Mark H.
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
Always been an advocate of 'serrated' rod / cap designs, interlockingHighest stress is in the bolts
While it doesn't completely eliminate the shear loads on the bolt, it at least vectors them through, say 45 deg, or such
- midnightbluS10
- Expert
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:41 am
- Location: Shreveport, LA
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
Finite Element Analysis. So he's said when that, process has been done, AFAIK. He making a noun into a verb. Using a word to describe itself or some such lol. He's using it to say they've been "Finite Element analyzed"swampbuggy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 7:17 am Digger please define the meaning of the word fea'd , excuse me if i seem dumb, Mark H.
JC -
bigjoe1 wrote:By the way, I had a long talk with Harold(Brookshire) last year at the PRI show. We met at the airport and he told me everything he knew about everything.It was a nice visit. JOE SHERMAN RACING
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
FEA can simulate anything you want
Please explain input for crank rotation?
Please explain input for crank rotation?
-
- Expert
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 3:37 pm
- Location:
Re: Connecting Rod Tech.
It would appear that I have confused CFD with FEA.
engine builder had an article on FEA not terribly long ago, worth a read.
engine builder had an article on FEA not terribly long ago, worth a read.