377 vortec

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: 377 vortec

Post by af2 »

408 Nova wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:42 am
rocketracer380 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 7:54 am 4.155 bore 3.48 stroke 0 deck flattops 11.0:1 comp stock vortecs holley single plain and .230@ 50 .248@50 .510 in .525 ex with 1.6 im at .544 in .560 ex guides machined for added clearence 750 carb is 480hp too optimistic for combo forgot to mention 5.7 rods and 1/16 ring pack or am i better off with a 5.565 rod 406 with same cam and heads
I'd say hp would be closer 425-450 going by similar combos I've seen.

Plus, I'd would run the 5.7 rods if you can make them fit. If they are stock type 350 rods, the rod bolts are longer than the rod bolts in the stock type 400 rods, so that the threaded end will hit the flanks of the cam on rod throws 1&2 and 5&6. So you'll either have to run a reduced base circle cam, or get a set of rods with a shorter rod bolt in them, or both.

I always have plenty of clearance with the Scat Pro Series rods. Just be aware that if you get a longer rod, you'll have to get a different set of pistons to correct the compression height (CH).
Never had a problem with a 3.50" crank in a 400 block ever using every 5.7" to 6.125 rod available.

You just reduced the swing by .125", why would there be a problem?
GURU is only a name.
Adam
skinny z
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:42 am
Location: AB. CA.

Re: 377 vortec

Post by skinny z »

af2 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:34 pm...a well done Vortec
That is the operative phrase here.
Kevin
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: 377 vortec

Post by af2 »

skinny z wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 9:16 pm
af2 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:34 pm...a well done Vortec
That is the operative phrase here.
I learned the hard way!
GURU is only a name.
Adam
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: 377 vortec

Post by af2 »

[quote="s
[/quote]

Something like that, yes.. Thats why I suggested porting with 2.02's to hit the target power.
[/quote]

I'm following along on this as I have a set of aftermarket Vortecs from RHS that have been pocket ported and flowed at 255 (2.02/1.6 w/~ 175 cc port, 65 cc chamber).
The decision is the CID that they'll sit on.
[/quote]

Those are an excellent head to run as is.
GURU is only a name.
Adam
skinny z
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:42 am
Location: AB. CA.

Re: 377 vortec

Post by skinny z »

rocketracer380 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 7:54 am .230@ 50 .248@50 .510 in .525 ex
rocketracer380 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 3:45 pm the cam i posted is 107 lsa
Do you have a part number or a link to that cam?
Kevin
rocketracer380
Pro
Pro
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 8:41 am
Location:

Re: 377 vortec

Post by rocketracer380 »

It’s a schnieder cam on there website also the Howard’s 110922-06s looks good too
rocketracer380
Pro
Pro
Posts: 331
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 8:41 am
Location:

Re: 377 vortec

Post by rocketracer380 »

I’ve seen 422. 440 and 447 hp vortec builds with dual plane intakes and pump gas 350’s even a cnc Motorsports build that made 466hp 500+ circle track builds with high comp no port rule cast intake even 450 hp is good as long as it makes 500 torque actually cnc build made 480 with a 500 lift rule a small carb and a dual plane intake
408 Nova
Pro
Pro
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:58 pm
Location: Selmer, TN

Re: 377 vortec

Post by 408 Nova »

af2 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 8:40 pm
408 Nova wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 11:42 am
rocketracer380 wrote: Tue Nov 03, 2020 7:54 am 4.155 bore 3.48 stroke 0 deck flattops 11.0:1 comp stock vortecs holley single plain and .230@ 50 .248@50 .510 in .525 ex with 1.6 im at .544 in .560 ex guides machined for added clearence 750 carb is 480hp too optimistic for combo forgot to mention 5.7 rods and 1/16 ring pack or am i better off with a 5.565 rod 406 with same cam and heads
I'd say hp would be closer 425-450 going by similar combos I've seen.

Plus, I'd would run the 5.7 rods if you can make them fit. If they are stock type 350 rods, the rod bolts are longer than the rod bolts in the stock type 400 rods, so that the threaded end will hit the flanks of the cam on rod throws 1&2 and 5&6. So you'll either have to run a reduced base circle cam, or get a set of rods with a shorter rod bolt in them, or both.

I always have plenty of clearance with the Scat Pro Series rods. Just be aware that if you get a longer rod, you'll have to get a different set of pistons to correct the compression height (CH).
Never had a problem with a 3.50" crank in a 400 block ever using every 5.7" to 6.125 rod available.

You just reduced the swing by .125", why would there be a problem?
Af2, you're exactly right. I was thinking of a 3.75" crank.

I stand corrected.
Post Reply