Home of Racing's Best and Brightest
https://www.speed-talk.com/forum/
Yes, right now my air T has a ring on it for testing 4150 carbs. I don't bother to set the date on my dyno, it has a default setting. Maybe I can take a picture of my Turbine setup and post. Hers a picture you can see the ring on the bottom of the turbine. One other thing I'd like to point out to YOU, notice how I post dyno data
I don't know if you did or not, but theirs some to be had porting and or removing material on the carb pad of those intakes.vortecpro wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:37 amYes its heavy........this build was about using parts I had lying around that ordinarily would have never been used, I like projects, now I have this complete engine and I kinda like it! Thats how the 327 shop truck was built as well.motormonkey wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:20 am Nice. Other than weight, those gm cast highrise intakes weren't that bad compared to some aftermarket intakes. I liked the square carb pattern better tho.
Are you going to run the cast exhaust for the full sleeper effect?
I ran it as produced stock, but I'am sure theres more there by cutting out the divider and moving the carb forward, but actually I need to utilize the power I have now first. Very happy with what I have so far, remember the cams the cork right now.motormonkey wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 10:45 amI don't know if you did or not, but theirs some to be had porting and or removing material on the carb pad of those intakes.vortecpro wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:37 amYes its heavy........this build was about using parts I had lying around that ordinarily would have never been used, I like projects, now I have this complete engine and I kinda like it! Thats how the 327 shop truck was built as well.motormonkey wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:20 am Nice. Other than weight, those gm cast highrise intakes weren't that bad compared to some aftermarket intakes. I liked the square carb pattern better tho.
Are you going to run the cast exhaust for the full sleeper effect?
Have you tried smaller headers on that engine?
I'm a fan of reusing underated OEM/take off parts that work but don't warrant the trash just yet. Good stocker class stuff.
Larrymaxracesoftware wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 2:23 pmfor a 11.000 ET it could Run these times/mph :
60= 1.472064 43.381176
330= 4.407033 78.812857
660= 6.923479 97.181471
1000= 9.121505 111.648284
1320= 11.000000 119.531990
..... pretty close to 120.00 MPH
by vortecpro » Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:30 pm
Larry
I've run 11.04 @ Denver with my peanut port in this Chevelle, here were the numbers I remember:
1.44
6.86
11.04 @ 118
Same setup @ Pueblo:
1.42
660 ?
10.90 @ 119
Code: Select all
some NHRA ET Slip info from my Database :
SS/KA 1.493 4.385 6.861 99.27 9.029 10.889 120.17
GT/QA 1.427 4.369 6.872 98.03 9.047 10.891 122.19
GT/QA 1.425 4.377 6.889 98.63 9.072 10.923 121.54
--------------------------------------------------
C/SA 1.478 4.414 6.929 97.05 9.129 11.001 120.14
D/SA 1.485 4.417 6.935 97.53 9.132 11.001 119.97
Thanks for the pic, Mark. Always nice to see how others are doing things. As to dyno data, I'm always hesitant to post exact numbers as there's nothing more tweaked, massaged and misunderstood.vortecpro wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:51 amYes, right now my air T has a ring on it for testing 4150 carbs. I don't bother to set the date on my dyno, it has a default setting. Maybe I can take a picture of my Turbine setup and post. Hers a picture you can see the ring on the bottom of the turbine. One other thing I'd like to point out to YOU, notice how I post dyno data
As to results, mid 10.90's (10.94, 10.95, 10.96 and 10.96) @119.20-119.80, 3,150 lbs, DA of 2,500, uncorrected baro of 28.9, 40% humidity, 74 degrees temp and an 8-10 mph. quartering wind from 11 o'clock and 6.5% convertor slippage will get you pretty close. Thank for all of that. In the past I've proved dyno data from one SF to another SF dyno properly calibrated is very close, infact 1 hp going from 6400 feet elevation to 800 feet elevation on a 660 HP engine, and these weren't my tests these were Super Flows tests. So that being said, I believe none of the above, I believe you think your on to something and are very secretive, now does that make you a bad person, NO. I enjoy your car build and testing and you as well, really. You have to understand I live for that data, and get very frustrated when I can't get it, so maybe I'am the problem-but I don't think so. I know exactly how much power your 327 makes. Hopefully you won't be to offended, because I like our give and take, but I had to say what was on my mind.tenxal wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 8:59 amThanks for the pic, Mark. Always nice to see how others are doing things. As to dyno data, I'm always hesitant to post exact numbers as there's nothing more tweaked, massaged and misunderstood.vortecpro wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:51 amYes, right now my air T has a ring on it for testing 4150 carbs. I don't bother to set the date on my dyno, it has a default setting. Maybe I can take a picture of my Turbine setup and post. Hers a picture you can see the ring on the bottom of the turbine. One other thing I'd like to point out to YOU, notice how I post dyno data
Hope all is well and you're safe and healthy.
My data is wrong, this is the correct data, as to my memorymaxracesoftware wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:03 amby vortecpro » Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:30 pm
Larry
I've run 11.04 @ Denver with my peanut port in this Chevelle, here were the numbers I remember:
1.44
6.86
11.04 @ 118
Same setup @ Pueblo:
1.42
660 ?
10.90 @ 119
its possible to Run somewhere within these Ranges :Code: Select all
some NHRA ET Slip info from my Database : SS/KA 1.493 4.385 6.861 99.27 9.029 10.889 120.17 GT/QA 1.427 4.369 6.872 98.03 9.047 10.891 122.19 GT/QA 1.425 4.377 6.889 98.63 9.072 10.923 121.54 -------------------------------------------------- C/SA 1.478 4.414 6.929 97.05 9.129 11.001 120.14 D/SA 1.485 4.417 6.935 97.53 9.132 11.001 119.97
( if i had all the ET Slips Feet increments + MPH , i could do a more accurate prediction on MPH @ each incremental )
60= 1.457153 43.753919
330= 4.368187 79.474598
660= 6.862108 98.077220
1000= 9.039426 112.717880
1320= 10.900000 120.688077
60= 1.472064 43.381176
330= 4.407033 78.812857
660= 6.923479 97.181471
1000= 9.121505 111.648284
1320= 11.000000 119.531990
60= 1.478036 43.229760
330= 4.422842 78.547675
660= 6.948225 96.831249
1000= 9.154445 111.231671
1320= 11.040000 119.083272
60= 1.440000 42.656863
330= 4.422842 78.904208
660= 6.860000 97.603485
1000= 9.154445 108.947708
1320= 11.040000 121.258906
Larry,maxracesoftware wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 1:03 amby vortecpro » Tue Jan 12, 2021 8:30 pm
Larry
I've run 11.04 @ Denver with my peanut port in this Chevelle, here were the numbers I remember:
1.44
6.86
11.04 @ 118
Same setup @ Pueblo:
1.42
660 ?
10.90 @ 119
its possible to Run somewhere within these Ranges :Code: Select all
some NHRA ET Slip info from my Database : SS/KA 1.493 4.385 6.861 99.27 9.029 10.889 120.17 GT/QA 1.427 4.369 6.872 98.03 9.047 10.891 122.19 GT/QA 1.425 4.377 6.889 98.63 9.072 10.923 121.54 -------------------------------------------------- C/SA 1.478 4.414 6.929 97.05 9.129 11.001 120.14 D/SA 1.485 4.417 6.935 97.53 9.132 11.001 119.97
( if i had all the ET Slips Feet increments + MPH , i could do a more accurate prediction on MPH @ each incremental )
60= 1.457153 43.753919
330= 4.368187 79.474598
660= 6.862108 98.077220
1000= 9.039426 112.717880
1320= 10.900000 120.688077
60= 1.472064 43.381176
330= 4.407033 78.812857
660= 6.923479 97.181471
1000= 9.121505 111.648284
1320= 11.000000 119.531990
60= 1.478036 43.229760
330= 4.422842 78.547675
660= 6.948225 96.831249
1000= 9.154445 111.231671
1320= 11.040000 119.083272
60= 1.440000 42.656863
330= 4.422842 78.904208
660= 6.860000 97.603485
1000= 9.154445 108.947708
1320= 11.040000 121.258906
Stan ,by Stan Weiss » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:26 am
Larry,
I don't know what you are using for Cd and FA.
The numbers I have for a '70 Chevelle are CD=.42 and FA=25.5
Stan