Opinion on X pipe design

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Schurkey
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:42 am
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by Schurkey »

eric8 wrote: Tue Aug 17, 2021 1:35 pm Well it does seem peppier now (shocker). But my old problem of pig rich mixtures at wide open throttle still remains. I think I may try a new AVS2 650 cfm Edelbrock and see how it responds. The 750 QF and an 800 Edelbrock seem just like they are too much, regardless of jetting changes.
One would think that the larger carbs would be easier to lean-out, since bigger venturis make for less booster signal; all else equal.

What kind of air cleaner are you using? Any chance you have a restricted snorkel? How much vacuum is on the clean side of the filter at WFO?
motormonkey
Member
Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 1:52 am
Location:

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by motormonkey »

What's your combo, vehicle weight and gearing to start with.
What jets your plugs look like.
Basics first.
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by Belgian1979 »

:lol: What a mess. I made my own, by using 2 90° bends, where I cut a section out of the outer part of the bend and welded them together. Works like a charm. I'm not a perfect welder by all means, but it was a lot better than what you have there. Over here they have a Dutch expression which roughly translates as 'it has been shit together instead of welded'.
shoedoos
Expert
Expert
Posts: 674
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:14 am
Location: New Zealand

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by shoedoos »

OP, please define "pig rich" in A/F numbers, also was this a momentary "pig rich" or a permanent "pig rich" at WOT? Have you played with the air bleeds? Confirmed the choke plate ain't hanging closed/semi-closed on you?
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by MadBill »

steve cowan wrote: Tue Aug 17, 2021 2:35 am...
where it is joined at the X could be full of slag for all we know,only one way to find out.
i can see the restriction causing more back pressure leading to combustion contamination etc,i would cut the system off and start again.
Wow, 'X' ray vision Steve! =D>
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by GARY C »

I always start with the Jegs universal kit, Summit has one as well.
https://www.jegs.com/p/JEGS/JEGS-Univer ... 2/10002/-1
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
In-Tech
Vendor
Posts: 2822
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:35 am
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by In-Tech »

Hiya,
With higher overlap, the exhaust can go either way based on pressure differential. Think EGR affect causing the richness. None of that non-mandrel bent tubing is helping. If you HAVE to use those exhaust manifolds get the pressure differential lower past the manifold.
Heat is energy, energy is horsepower...but you gotta control the heat.
-Carl
steve cowan
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2276
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:22 am
Location: brisbane AUSTRALIA

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by steve cowan »

eric8 wrote: Tue Aug 17, 2021 7:02 am Thanks for all the responses. I was confused about what I had said earlier. A clogged exhaust or high back pressure can cause a wide band to read rich. But Shurkey is correct in that a misfire will cause a lean indication.

So far I’ve gone through a brand new Quick Fuel 750 SS that came stock with 72/80 jetting and went all the way down to 64/68 jetting and it still ran pig rich at WOT. Same behavior with a brand new AVS2 edelbrock 800. Even after going down 2 stages lean on the primary metering rods and 2 stages lean on the secondary jets.

I’ve come to the conclusion that my issue HAS to be this x pipe or either the position of my o2 sensor is causing it to read faulty under wide open throttle. I have the AEM wideband that says to install 18” from the head. I didn’t follow this and put the o2 in the factory bung in the manifolds I had to use which is closer than 18” to the head.
not sure how much time and money you are prepared to spend but i would square jet that carb (750) and install a rear powervalve and PVRC jets.
74-74 jets
depending on cam and vacuum 8.5'' - 10.5'' power valves front and rear
need to road test with vac gauge and check manifold vac.
start off 58'' PVRC jet.
understand if you dont have carb parts etc,just a starting point thats all.
steve c
"Pretty don't make power"
In-Tech
Vendor
Posts: 2822
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:35 am
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: Opinion on X pipe design

Post by In-Tech »

steve cowan wrote: Wed Aug 18, 2021 3:03 am not sure how much time and money you are prepared to spend but i would square jet that carb (750) and install a rear powervalve and PVRC jets.
74-74 jets
depending on cam and vacuum 8.5'' - 10.5'' power valves front and rear
need to road test with vac gauge and check manifold vac.
start off 58'' PVRC jet.
understand if you dont have carb parts etc,just a starting point thats all.
Good numbers for a starting point. I normally use 72 jet with downlegs and a .065" pv jetting, then for safety test, start with a 10.5 pv. Totally depends on app. Good call Steve.
Heat is energy, energy is horsepower...but you gotta control the heat.
-Carl
Post Reply