Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
Moderator: Team
Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
This seems like the most obvious metric for determining an engine’s true cfm needs, so it has me wondering. My mild 430 hp 383 SBC on a Superflo dyno had a cfm rating of 592 at 5,900 rpms. A 650 cfm carb should in fact be plenty, no? Just thinking out loud. Am I missing something?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
Yes you are correct, especially in terms of the best average fuel usage!
Of course here’s the caveat, if you want to trade off some of that great fuel mileage for a slower nose dive of the peak HP number then a 750 cfm Carb would provide that.
Of course here’s the caveat, if you want to trade off some of that great fuel mileage for a slower nose dive of the peak HP number then a 750 cfm Carb would provide that.
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
- Stan Weiss
- Vendor
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
What was the dyno correction on that pull. Remember that 592 cfm produced your UN corrected HP.eric8 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:03 pm This seems like the most obvious metric for determining an engine’s true cfm needs, so it has me wondering. My mild 430 hp 383 SBC on a Superflo dyno had a cfm rating of 592 at 5,900 rpms. A 650 cfm carb should in fact be plenty, no? Just thinking out loud. Am I missing something?
Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
-
- Expert
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
Remember a couple things:
1 - Carb flow numbers are mostly marketing, and only vaguely related to real testing.
2 - Assuming the carb is correctly rated the standard test pressure is 1.5" hg, which is related to the size of the test vacuum cleaner and not what an engine actually wants. For max performance that is a higher pressure drop than optimal.
The engine will pull what it wants mostly regardless of the carb size unless the carb is excessively small. It just means the carb delta P will be higher with a smaller carb. Excessive delta P will reduce VE and power, with diminishing returns as you get bigger. Usually you want a bigger rating of carb cfm compared to actual engine flow. However the carb also has to be able to properly meter air fuel throughout the entire operating range.
End result - a bigger carb is better for performance, a smaller carb is better for low rpm metering.
1 - Carb flow numbers are mostly marketing, and only vaguely related to real testing.
2 - Assuming the carb is correctly rated the standard test pressure is 1.5" hg, which is related to the size of the test vacuum cleaner and not what an engine actually wants. For max performance that is a higher pressure drop than optimal.
The engine will pull what it wants mostly regardless of the carb size unless the carb is excessively small. It just means the carb delta P will be higher with a smaller carb. Excessive delta P will reduce VE and power, with diminishing returns as you get bigger. Usually you want a bigger rating of carb cfm compared to actual engine flow. However the carb also has to be able to properly meter air fuel throughout the entire operating range.
End result - a bigger carb is better for performance, a smaller carb is better for low rpm metering.
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
eric8 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:03 pm This seems like the most obvious metric for determining an engine’s true cfm needs, so it has me wondering. My mild 430 hp 383 SBC on a Superflo dyno had a cfm rating of 592 at 5,900 rpms. A 650 cfm carb should in fact be plenty, no? Just thinking out loud. Am I missing something?
you need to hookup + record Plenum vacuum underneath the Carb
this along with SCFM from Air Turbine readings + what Stan wanted HP correction factor
and Fuel Consumed readings in Lbs/HP hour would be great to see also
remember Carb CFM rated @1.50" Hg and is dry CFM rating
on a Dyno test the Carb will be flowing relatively wet flow, so that actual CFM will be reduced from dry CFM rating
so measure how much Plenum vacuum
caution : DO NOT hookup vacuum to an individual runner
instead measure plenum vacuum underneath the Carb
the SuperFlow Air Turbine reading is not an exact CFM or SCFM reading , sometimes its pretty close , sometimes its not !
Typically : Plenum Vacuum over 1.2" Hg means Carb is starting to restrict Peak HP
measuring 1.5" Hg or higher , usually always leaves more higher RPM HP on the table or to be gained
Caution :
the SuperFlow HP Correction Factor you see in WinDyn
is NOT the actual "HP Correction Factor" because it does not include their Friction Factor
so use the equations to really see the SF total correction factor
Caution : make very sure that the [ Dyno HP Weather Correction Factor ] includes Friction HP Losses , if the HPCF equation uses Friction HP Losses
******
Dyno HP Weather Correction Factor = CBHP / UBHP ......... using this equation insures the HPCF input value is correct !
Dyno HP Weather Correction Factor = (CBHP * BSFC) / FuelLbsHour ......... or using this equation insures the HPCF input value is correct !
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
You will never find such an engine not make some more power if with a 750 cfm carb vs a 650 cfm carb.
The air turbine does not tell you anything.
Such a discribed engine will make even a bit more power at least, if with 2 x750 4 bbl carbs.
And when you do test the bigger carb(s) and see the power increase, the air turbine reading will also increase a bit more.
The air turbine does not tell you anything.
Such a discribed engine will make even a bit more power at least, if with 2 x750 4 bbl carbs.
And when you do test the bigger carb(s) and see the power increase, the air turbine reading will also increase a bit more.
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
I can see no type of correction factor listing on the dyno sheet. All that is labeled is “correction method: standard”Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 4:09 pmWhat was the dyno correction on that pull. Remember that 592 cfm produced your UN corrected HP.eric8 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:03 pm This seems like the most obvious metric for determining an engine’s true cfm needs, so it has me wondering. My mild 430 hp 383 SBC on a Superflo dyno had a cfm rating of 592 at 5,900 rpms. A 650 cfm carb should in fact be plenty, no? Just thinking out loud. Am I missing something?
Stan
- Stan Weiss
- Vendor
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
Can you post the dyno sheet?eric8 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:17 pmI can see no type of correction factor listing on the dyno sheet. All that is labeled is “correction method: standard”Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 4:09 pmWhat was the dyno correction on that pull. Remember that 592 cfm produced your UN corrected HP.eric8 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:03 pm This seems like the most obvious metric for determining an engine’s true cfm needs, so it has me wondering. My mild 430 hp 383 SBC on a Superflo dyno had a cfm rating of 592 at 5,900 rpms. A 650 cfm carb should in fact be plenty, no? Just thinking out loud. Am I missing something?
Stan
If not, does the dyno sheet have UN corrected HP?
If not, does the dyno sheet have fule lbs/hr, BSFC, abd A/F Ratio?
Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location:
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
No mention of what carb used nor final application. Measured plenum vacuum is valid too.
430 hp is a decent street engine
750 CFM is a reasonable default for 383 cu in, vacuum secondary for mild or heavy vehicles, mechanical secondary for street/strip or more performance oriented. Vacuum secondary doesn’t automatically mean less output, and in many cases can make up for inadequate gearing or converter stall. Edelbrock AVS II carbs impress me, especially on smaller displacement engines.
The most important aspect of dyno time for me is the carb tuning. Shipping an engine out with a good graph makes little sense if the carb that it was tested with isn’t sent with the engine. What if your carb is down 20 numbers? I can’t recall how many “good used carbs” I’ve had that were just crap or needed a kit or wildly rejetted from stock.
430 hp is a decent street engine
750 CFM is a reasonable default for 383 cu in, vacuum secondary for mild or heavy vehicles, mechanical secondary for street/strip or more performance oriented. Vacuum secondary doesn’t automatically mean less output, and in many cases can make up for inadequate gearing or converter stall. Edelbrock AVS II carbs impress me, especially on smaller displacement engines.
The most important aspect of dyno time for me is the carb tuning. Shipping an engine out with a good graph makes little sense if the carb that it was tested with isn’t sent with the engine. What if your carb is down 20 numbers? I can’t recall how many “good used carbs” I’ve had that were just crap or needed a kit or wildly rejetted from stock.
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
The dyno carb was a 750 cfm quick fuel mech secondary. This engine is in a 77 C10 pickup with a manual transmission and 3:73 gears. I never thought the Quick Fuel ran well even after significant tuning so I put on an Edelbrock AVS2 800 cfm which runs great. I was just tossing around the idea of trying the 650 AVS2 to see if it offered any improved responsiveness.rustbucket79 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:39 pm No mention of what carb used nor final application. Measured plenum vacuum is valid too.
430 hp is a decent street engine
750 CFM is a reasonable default for 383 cu in, vacuum secondary for mild or heavy vehicles, mechanical secondary for street/strip or more performance oriented. Vacuum secondary doesn’t automatically mean less output, and in many cases can make up for inadequate gearing or converter stall. Edelbrock AVS II carbs impress me, especially on smaller displacement engines.
The most important aspect of dyno time for me is the carb tuning. Shipping an engine out with a good graph makes little sense if the carb that it was tested with isn’t sent with the engine. What if your carb is down 20 numbers? I can’t recall how many “good used carbs” I’ve had that were just crap or needed a kit or wildly rejetted from stock.
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
When I get back to the shop I will post that up. I know for sure it has BSFC and AFR but not sure about uncorrected hp.Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:30 pmCan you post the dyno sheet?eric8 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:17 pmI can see no type of correction factor listing on the dyno sheet. All that is labeled is “correction method: standard”Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Thu Sep 02, 2021 4:09 pm
What was the dyno correction on that pull. Remember that 592 cfm produced your UN corrected HP.
Stan
If not, does the dyno sheet have UN corrected HP?
If not, does the dyno sheet have fule lbs/hr, BSFC, abd A/F Ratio?
Stan
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3656
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
if you have both BSFC and AFR that's enough info to calculate a whole bunch of Data , along with UBHP ( Uncorrected Brake HP )When I get back to the shop I will post that up. I know for sure it has BSFC and AFR but not sure about uncorrected hp.
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
What was the power and torque difference between the Eddy 800 avs2 and the QF750?
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
I never dynoed it with the Eddy. Definitely could not tell any seat of the pants difference between the two though.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location:
Re: Using Dyno CFM reading for carb sizing
Wasted move with the 650. Try tuning the secondary air door on your 800, that could improve response.