Was that a 950hp? I think the 950 is in name only and actually flows less than a true 850 cfm carb?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=22238&sid=a63cfd338 ... 86fa510551
What happened here ?
Moderator: Team
Re: What happened here ?
It flows the most on that test with least vacuum so it's the highest flowing of those carbs.stealth wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:15 pm Was that a 950hp? I think the 950 is in name only and actually flows less than a true 850 cfm carb?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=22238&sid=a63cfd338 ... 86fa510551
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Re: What happened here ?
Yep, it’s only the Part #0-80496-2 950’cfm’ with those 750/850 crossbred dimensions. Red faced Holley overcompensated when doing the Ultra XP line and went 1.600” venturi for the 950.Tom68 wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 10:06 pmIt flows the most on that test with least vacuum so it's the highest flowing of those carbs.stealth wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 5:15 pm Was that a 950hp? I think the 950 is in name only and actually flows less than a true 850 cfm carb?
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=22238&sid=a63cfd338 ... 86fa510551
I’m a Street/Strip guy..... like to think outside the quadrilateral parallelogram.