Old man here and just looked online at HD site and specifically the NEW Sportsters
My impressions: Very powerful, Very complicated, seems like it still has four cams but they're all on top, looks like a vrod ...
............new sportster (like it's fugly vrod cuz) is just plain FUGLY. While I might stomach a New big twin, I could not buy New sportster
good luck w/ that HD
Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
Moderator: Team
Re: Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
Agreed Knight, Mouse and Rebel, a Sporty is a Sportster, not a shrunk big twin. If we wanted either we would buy either.
Twenty odd years ago i built a 100" Sporty for myself, trouble was it went real good! Real good! i didn't, my capability in riding was not up to the bike's.
Cheers.
Twenty odd years ago i built a 100" Sporty for myself, trouble was it went real good! Real good! i didn't, my capability in riding was not up to the bike's.
Cheers.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:48 pm
- Location:
Re: Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
Let's see I was 14 in 1967 used to go with my father to look at both the sportster and triumph bonneville dream of owning one. By 18 1971 had to have the honda four and it was must have power smoothness ever since. Until lately bought a new 2018 bonneville not as good looking as the older triumphs but by far best overall motorcycle I have ever had. I'm almost certain I will buy last of the solid mount sportster 2003 shortly. I will be putting it back to at least look like the late 60s sportsters when they were the strait line hot rod.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 859
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:48 pm
- Location:
Re: Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
Let's see I was 14 in 1967 used to go with my father to look at both the sportster and triumph bonneville dream of owning one. By 18 1971 had to have the honda four and it was must have power smoothness ever since. Until lately bought a new 2018 bonneville not as good looking as the older triumphs but by far best overall motorcycle I have ever had. I'm almost certain I will buy last of the solid mount sportster 2003 shortly. I will be putting it back to at least look like the late 60s sportsters when they were the strait line hot rod.
-
- HotPass
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:27 am
- Location: LA and SF
Re: Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
Admittedly, you may be right.
Re: Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
This is the best Sportster I had... Despite me not liking the rubber mounted engine, It was light at 435 pounds, quick handling and fast . Some engine tuning, conversion to chain drive for better gearing choices... The 1200 Evo sportster lump was quite happy at about 85-90 hp...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Motorcycle land speed racing... wearing animal hides and clinging to vibrating oily machines propelled by fire
Re: Why Didn't Harley Simply Add This Counterbalancer To The Sportster?
lol
thats the best sporster i ever had , too, after you sold it to me.
running in modified production though, its a bear to hang onto at its best of 132mph. ive got three front pulleys thst give me some flexibility in gearing.
i dont find the vibration excessive, but ive ridden old vertical twins all my life.
thats the best sporster i ever had , too, after you sold it to me.
running in modified production though, its a bear to hang onto at its best of 132mph. ive got three front pulleys thst give me some flexibility in gearing.
i dont find the vibration excessive, but ive ridden old vertical twins all my life.
i didn't mean to blow it up