Automotive uses the more expensive dohc with or without rockers, they do it for vvt.Wolfo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:07 pmSOHC finger follower designs are quite common, but more in the motorcycle world.nicholastanguma wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:04 pm I'm again assuming SOHC is a typo, and you meant DOHC, since I don't see how finger followers can be utilized with a single overhead cam design. As far as I know, only double overhead cams can act directly on valve springs without the use of rocker arms.
However, if I am wrong, please correct me, as I would very much like to know how finger follower design could successfully replace the typical rocker arm design typically associated with SOHC engines.
See for example a KTM 450 SXF cylinder head. Or several Honda designs (marketing name "UNICAM") for 450ccm engines.
There are a lot of engines like this, but these are recent examples.
Some theory could be found in Mahle publications and books from Ludwig Apfelbeck.
Too expensive for automotive engines, so only common in motorcycle engine design.
Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
Moderator: Team
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
Aand valve speed
-juhana
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
-
- HotPass
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:27 am
- Location: LA and SF
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
Wolfo wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:07 pmSOHC finger follower designs are quite common, but more in the motorcycle world.nicholastanguma wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:04 pm I'm again assuming SOHC is a typo, and you meant DOHC, since I don't see how finger followers can be utilized with a single overhead cam design. As far as I know, only double overhead cams can act directly on valve springs without the use of rocker arms.
However, if I am wrong, please correct me, as I would very much like to know how finger follower design could successfully replace the typical rocker arm design typically associated with SOHC engines.
See for example a KTM 450 SXF cylinder head. Or several Honda designs (marketing name "UNICAM") for 450ccm engines.
There are a lot of engines like this, but these are recent examples.
Some theory could be found in Mahle publications and books from Ludwig Apfelbeck.
Too expensive for automotive engines, so only common in motorcycle engine design.
Thank you for the correction and examples.
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
Lobes look bigger than their clearance area.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
-
- HotPass
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:27 am
- Location: LA and SF
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
Okay, I just looked at some diagrams of these SOHC mills, and indeed they do use finger followers as you state. Now I understand how finger followers can be used to replace rocker arms in single overhead cam architecture, a picture is worth a thousand words. Danke, ich weiß deine Hilfe zu schätzen!
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
You make it sound radical But yes, the lobes makes a positive affect. That was a Renault F4R valvetrain, hydraulic finger rocker arm thing. Catcams 5502423 with a lift to valve diameter ratio of .336. 8000rpm in a endurance hi performance is like pushing luck. I would like to push the l/d ratio to max using this kind of valve train. A basic engine like this has a mean piston speed of 5500ft/min @ 9000rpm.
-juhana
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
and on DOHC. Patent applied for by Louis Chevrolet in 1917.nicholastanguma wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 6:46 am
Okay, I just looked at some diagrams of these SOHC mills, and indeed they do use finger followers as you state. Now I understand how finger followers can be used to replace rocker arms in single overhead cam architecture, a picture is worth a thousand words. Danke, ich weiß deine Hilfe zu schätzen!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 11003
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: CA
Re: Short Pushrods and Tall RPMs in Real World Performance
The potential depends on the base circle of the cam and the lobe designs that can work with the follower geometry.
Helping to Deliver the Promise of Flying Cars