Closed chamber BBC heads
Moderator: Team
-
- Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:06 am
- Location:
Closed chamber BBC heads
How much power can a set of bowl blended oem 206 bbc heads with std size valves support on a 454?
9.5 in comp
Hyd roller 224/230@050 .600 .580 112 ls
Rpm intake
I hope close to 500 hp or am I to optimistic?
9.5 in comp
Hyd roller 224/230@050 .600 .580 112 ls
Rpm intake
I hope close to 500 hp or am I to optimistic?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
Those heads with there stock 2.06” intake valve should flow at least 245 cfm to 250 cfm @.600” lift.
This should make you 475 Hp .
If your doing the porting work yourself then be sure to look at some of the better detailed porting videos on YouTube that you can find.
You should have the intake and exh valves back cut with a 30 degree that’s at least.025” wide.
If your budget permits I would step up to the 1.88” exh valve size and blend that in nice to a 3 angle valve job.
If your intake valve bowl work gets you 260 cfm @ .550” lift then 500 hp should be yours!
This should make you 475 Hp .
If your doing the porting work yourself then be sure to look at some of the better detailed porting videos on YouTube that you can find.
You should have the intake and exh valves back cut with a 30 degree that’s at least.025” wide.
If your budget permits I would step up to the 1.88” exh valve size and blend that in nice to a 3 angle valve job.
If your intake valve bowl work gets you 260 cfm @ .550” lift then 500 hp should be yours!
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
-
- Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:06 am
- Location:
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
Heads are already done, local porter did the job.mag2555 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:46 am Those heads with there stock 2.06” intake valve should flow at least 245 cfm to 250 cfm @.600” lift.
This should make you 475 Hp .
If your doing the porting work yourself then be sure to look at some of the better detailed porting videos on YouTube that you can find.
You should have the intake and exh valves back cut with a 30 degree that’s at least.025” wide.
If your budget permits I would step up to the 1.88” exh valve size and blend that in nice to a 3 angle valve job.
If your intake valve bowl work gets you 260 cfm @ .550” lift then 500 hp should be yours!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
Even with lower Compression an open chamber head with all the same valve sizes will make more power.
-
- Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:06 am
- Location:
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
Might be true but this is what I have, to much money invested to change direction now.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
No flow test was done even just on one cylinder?
It’s hard to tell from photos how well the needed work was done, but what I can say from reviewing the photos is that at least the work done was not excessive as the guy did not even boat tail the cylinder wall side of the exh valve guide.
In short I don’t think any harm was done to the as cast flow numbers which can many times be the case when work is done unaided by a flow bench!
Even if the bowl porting work picked up on the intake side only picked up 10 cfm by .500” lift, then with the .600” lift that your running your goal of 500 hp should be had.
Also if your running headers they will pick up the exh flow numbers by 3 to 4% especially at peak flow.
Once it’s up and running for a while I would switch to a extended tip plug that’s 1 heat range colder then what your running now depending on where the color change over point is on the plugs you start out with.
It’s hard to tell from photos how well the needed work was done, but what I can say from reviewing the photos is that at least the work done was not excessive as the guy did not even boat tail the cylinder wall side of the exh valve guide.
In short I don’t think any harm was done to the as cast flow numbers which can many times be the case when work is done unaided by a flow bench!
Even if the bowl porting work picked up on the intake side only picked up 10 cfm by .500” lift, then with the .600” lift that your running your goal of 500 hp should be had.
Also if your running headers they will pick up the exh flow numbers by 3 to 4% especially at peak flow.
Once it’s up and running for a while I would switch to a extended tip plug that’s 1 heat range colder then what your running now depending on where the color change over point is on the plugs you start out with.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
-
- Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:06 am
- Location:
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
No not flowedmag2555 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 7:07 am No flow test was done even just on one cylinder?
It’s hard to tell from photos how well the needed work was done, but what I can say from reviewing the photos is that at least the work done was not excessive as the guy did not even boat tail the cylinder wall side of the exh valve guide.
In short I don’t think any harm was done to the as cast flow numbers which can many times be the case when work is done unaided by a flow bench!
Even if the bowl porting work picked up on the intake side only picked up 10 cfm by .500” lift, then with the .600” lift that your running your goal of 500 hp should be had.
Also if your running headers they will pick up the exh flow numbers by 3 to 4% especially at peak flow.
Once it’s up and running for a while I would switch to a extended tip plug that’s 1 heat range colder then what your running now depending on where the color change over point is on the plugs you start out with.
He is supposed to be good but no idea? All sharp turns was smoothed and the area under the valve was also smoothed. Before the exhaust almost was 90 deg and lots of edges under the valves so hope it picked up some? Didnt cost me much to have him do them. The seats are multi angle cut and Im using ferrea 5000 valves so hope they flow better than oem.
Will use 1 3/4” headers.
Ngk fr5 is the plugs I will use they are one step colder than oem.
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
Although you are correct in a bone stock environment, this in NOT true in an environment where you can utilize changes, those "bathtub" heads can make an incredible amount of power, even with oversize valves and the shrouding that occurs. Too much to type but some simple chamber work including laying that area "underneath" the ex valve will make drastic improvements. Widen the short turn on the ex port, think single pattern or reverse pattern on the camshaft.
Heat is energy, energy is horsepower...but you gotta control the heat.
-Carl
-Carl
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
With 2 sets of BBC heads I tested that were both ported, both had 2.19 and 1.88 valves. Set one was a 215 closed chambered heads comp ratio of 8.9:1 and all else being the same my car ran 11.70@112mph. The other set was my ported 360 peanut port heads with the porting treatment with a compression ratio of 7.98:1 ran the best of 11.26@116mph. same intake, carb, cam and headers. Which one makes more power do you think?In-Tech wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:01 pmAlthough you are correct in a bone stock environment, this in NOT true in an environment where you can utilize changes, those "bathtub" heads can make an incredible amount of power, even with oversize valves and the shrouding that occurs. Too much to type but some simple chamber work including laying that area "underneath" the ex valve will make drastic improvements. Widen the short turn on the ex port, think single pattern or reverse pattern on the camshaft.
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
I certainly understand that, sometimes you have to use what you have, nothing wrong with that.Mark Williams wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 4:04 amMight be true but this is what I have, to much money invested to change direction now.
- af2
- Guru
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
- Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
So correct I won't even go there!In-Tech wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 3:01 pmAlthough you are correct in a bone stock environment, this in NOT true in an environment where you can utilize changes, those "bathtub" heads can make an incredible amount of power, even with oversize valves and the shrouding that occurs. Too much to type but some simple chamber work including laying that area "underneath" the ex valve will make drastic improvements. Widen the short turn on the ex port, think single pattern or reverse pattern on the camshaft.
Would be awesome to see Mark chime in..
GURU is only a name.
Adam
Adam
- af2
- Guru
- Posts: 7014
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
- Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
You mean a local grinder. Those are not even close to the ones done in the 60's that flat hauled the mail.Mark Williams wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:27 pmHeads are already done, local porter did the job.mag2555 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:46 am Those heads with there stock 2.06” intake valve should flow at least 245 cfm to 250 cfm @.600” lift.
This should make you 475 Hp .
If your doing the porting work yourself then be sure to look at some of the better detailed porting videos on YouTube that you can find.
You should have the intake and exh valves back cut with a 30 degree that’s at least.025” wide.
If your budget permits I would step up to the 1.88” exh valve size and blend that in nice to a 3 angle valve job.
If your intake valve bowl work gets you 260 cfm @ .550” lift then 500 hp should be yours!
GURU is only a name.
Adam
Adam
Re: Closed chamber BBC heads
Although the 206 casting is the worst closed chamber head in my opinion. The work looks good, and I can that supporting 500 HP, but maybe not with that cam, but possible.Mark Williams wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 10:27 pmHeads are already done, local porter did the job.mag2555 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:46 am Those heads with there stock 2.06” intake valve should flow at least 245 cfm to 250 cfm @.600” lift.
This should make you 475 Hp .
If your doing the porting work yourself then be sure to look at some of the better detailed porting videos on YouTube that you can find.
You should have the intake and exh valves back cut with a 30 degree that’s at least.025” wide.
If your budget permits I would step up to the 1.88” exh valve size and blend that in nice to a 3 angle valve job.
If your intake valve bowl work gets you 260 cfm @ .550” lift then 500 hp should be yours!
Racing a NA NHRA stocker should be mandatory before any posting.