Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

dannobee
Expert
Expert
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2019 9:01 pm
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by dannobee »

Mahle has a white paper on this stuff too. Cylinder Components.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/b ... -1%2F1.pdf
RDY4WAR
Expert
Expert
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2017 12:58 am
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by RDY4WAR »

pamotorman wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 5:06 pm i rebuilt a Jr johnson built BBC that had .060 rod side clearance but the rods were located by the pistons on the small ends. doing it this way means the oil flow which cools the bearings passing thru rod bearing is consent
The oil doesn't actually cool the bearings. The majority of bearing heat comes from hydrodynamic friction of the oil film itself. Even the rod bearings only see ~3% of combustion heat. It's why bearing temps increase with higher viscosity and why oil doesn't warm up much from idling on a cold morning.

The sense of cooling is through preventing excessive heat from being generated to begin with.
ELS
Pro
Pro
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2022 2:24 pm
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by ELS »

Walter R. Malik wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 11:11 am
ELS wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:57 pm
Walter R. Malik wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 4:51 pm

If you already have all the answers about this, then why are you asking this question ...?
Probably because you are trying to find justification for what you think ...?
Sorry, I rained on your parade.
what?
so because I ask, that means I know the answer already? :lol:
NO, not at all ... because you attempt to argue with an answer shows this to be. If you don't like someone's answer, just forget it.
so for example if someone tells me the earth is flat, and I havent tested it myself. is it wrong to argue about it to try to understand how they came to this conclusion? do I rather ignore them and let them continue telling everyone this when they probably misunderstood something in their math or whatever?

I dont agree at all with "if you dont like an answer, just ignore it"... thats just being ignorant
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6381
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by Walter R. Malik »

ELS wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 7:35 am
Walter R. Malik wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 11:11 am
ELS wrote: Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:57 pm
what?
so because I ask, that means I know the answer already? :lol:
NO, not at all ... because you attempt to argue with an answer shows this to be. If you don't like someone's answer, just forget it.
so for example if someone tells me the earth is flat, and I havent tested it myself. is it wrong to argue about it to try to understand how they came to this conclusion? do I rather ignore them and let them continue telling everyone this when they probably misunderstood something in their math or whatever?

I dont agree at all with "if you dont like an answer, just ignore it"... thats just being ignorant
If you asked them a question about the the Earth and wanting information but, got an answer you did not agree with ... then an ensuing argument is showing the ignorance, not the other way around. They didn't ask you for anything ... you "asked" them.

You are not expected or required to agree or not.
By simply asking the question, hopefully your goal was not to kibitz but, to learn and forward you own education.

Apparently, you just can't understand that.




...
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
ELS
Pro
Pro
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2022 2:24 pm
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by ELS »

Walter R. Malik wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 10:42 am
ELS wrote: Wed Jun 22, 2022 7:35 am
Walter R. Malik wrote: Mon Jun 20, 2022 11:11 am

NO, not at all ... because you attempt to argue with an answer shows this to be. If you don't like someone's answer, just forget it.
so for example if someone tells me the earth is flat, and I havent tested it myself. is it wrong to argue about it to try to understand how they came to this conclusion? do I rather ignore them and let them continue telling everyone this when they probably misunderstood something in their math or whatever?

I dont agree at all with "if you dont like an answer, just ignore it"... thats just being ignorant
If you asked them a question about the the Earth and wanting information but, got an answer you did not agree with ... then an ensuing argument is showing the ignorance, not the other way around. They didn't ask you for anything ... you "asked" them.

You are not expected or required to agree or not.
By simply asking the question, hopefully your goal was not to kibitz but, to learn and forward you own education.

Apparently, you just can't understand that.




...
Oh, I didn't know asking more than 1 question was frowned upon.

gee it seems that asking shit on forums is useless unless it is like "what's 1+1?"... impossible to get an answer, just hate.
User avatar
modok
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3323
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:50 am
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by modok »

Remember you aren't the only one watching.
After the ego battle is over let me know, then we can get back to in fixing the problem.
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by Tom68 »

They're self limiting, even in a fullu grooved bearing the oil has to try and force past a 2, 2 thou x around 7'' gap.
Oil pressure relief valve take care of the excess oil flow from the pump that's sized to keep all pressure to all parts even in a well worn engine. All you need is pressure in the main gallery and you have even distribution.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
User avatar
juuhanaa
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:14 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by juuhanaa »

I dont know is this of topic, but two small things i found from a rally engine (builder made a spare incase it is needed in future ---> good thinking)

Some reason what i dont know, the surface where we measure the side clearance, has not been machined like in the bearing housing. The bearings are similar to some diesel engine? Im guessing it is to increase rod strength, but maybe some one know better does it have affects to oiling requirements? I have no idea,

Screenshot_20220623-232600.jpg


-juhana
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6381
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by Walter R. Malik »

modok wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:33 pm Remember you aren't the only one watching.
After the ego battle is over let me know, then we can get back to in fixing the problem.
OK, modok ... one more time; maybe a bit clearer this time.

You can never have to much oil flow "to a plain bearing" which uses a hydrostatic wedge to survive ... NEVER.
Allow the journal circumference and bearing clearance, (along with the oil pressure), to regulate the oil "leaving" the bearing.
Oil is a cooant along with delivering the lubrication.

The only reason to limit oil volume going anywhere in an engine is to make certain the bearings always get enough oil. Some people like to run smaller volume oil pumps than normal and enough oil volume to the bearings is paramount.

Maybe there are oil burning or leakage issues somewhere but, that is a different problem altogether.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
User avatar
modok
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3323
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:50 am
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by modok »

I agree, and I expect you would agree generally with my initial suggestion.
Although say a rocker does not need to be even a full circle so what is the clearance of that are then? :P
But without more details of exactly what this driveshaft thing looks like and does, It's hard to say for sure.
Maybe that's not the question tho it could be the answer :lol:
If you can put the oil feed just upstream of the loaded zone in an area the clearance remains about the same as it wears, then it can wear and not change how much oil flows.

Or another way you can look at it is relative terms say.... the oil pump produces a volume per rev, or a pressure, and how much of that oil goes to each bearing depends on the SIZE of oil feed to it as compared to all the other bearings. Usually "the curtain area" of the oil feed hole. Tho at small clearances I think it ends up non linear to area...not just like a carburetor jet....but at larger gaps it might.

Lots of ways to solve a problem.
The required oil flow could be "calculated" in a lot of different ways too I bet depending on how you define that, some estimation of load? Or just leakage? I can't be much help there.
Last edited by modok on Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
modok
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3323
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:50 am
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by modok »

juuhanaa wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:21 pm picture of rod with cheeks blasted

-juhana
They shot blasted the sides, just because being lazy. Some would say it isn't very important enough to worry about.
But if it was maximum effort then it should be ground smooth.
fabr
Expert
Expert
Posts: 594
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2019 8:35 pm
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by fabr »

The shot blaster sides would not bother me at all. The important thing is enough side clearance. Rule of thumb I read of is 4X bearing clearance = MIN side clearance that will not heat the oil beyond what the oil absorbs from journal/bearing and the oil from friction of the oil itself with itself. I think most would shoot for 1.5X though. (.003X4=.012X1.5=.018 side clearance minimum) I do anyway. ANYTHING beyond that is good to go.
Last edited by fabr on Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
modok
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3323
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:50 am
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by modok »

And just to be clear we are talking about oil flow to an "oil pump driveshaft bearing" right?
I read the first post twice but still not 100% sure.
fabr
Expert
Expert
Posts: 594
Joined: Sun Jul 21, 2019 8:35 pm
Location:

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by fabr »

modok wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:29 pm And just to be clear we are talking about oil flow to an "oil pump driveshaft bearing" right?
I read the first post twice but still not 100% sure.
I may be wrong but I didn't take it that way.
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Calculating journal bearing oiling requirements

Post by Tom68 »

modok wrote: Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:29 pm And just to be clear we are talking about oil flow to an "oil pump driveshaft bearing" right?
I read the first post twice but still not 100% sure.
If he wants to restrict bearings in a series I'm assuming mains to look after his apparently vulnerable oil pump drive shaft ???????????????????? But I'm sure I'm wrong.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Post Reply