Another LSA test

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2569
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Another LSA test

Post by Tom68 »

https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/camsh ... explained/

All good but 101 installed 101, 107 installed 107 but then 113 is installed at 109 or there's a typo.
In Cl.jpg

The cranking pressure varied by an equal amount.

Ideally they'd do them all 4 degrees advanced from straight up since that's how the majority of cams are installed, that'd be interesting for the 101 cam. :shock:

Oddly the crossover isn't at 5250 for all the tests.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
User avatar
panic
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Ecbatana
Contact:

Re: Another LSA test

Post by panic »

Oddly the crossover isn't at 5250 for all the tests

That's called a "mistake".
HP is defined by torque (if using lb./ft) and RPM, the lines always cross there.
hoffman900
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:42 pm
Location:

Re: Another LSA test

Post by hoffman900 »

panic wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 10:16 am Oddly the crossover isn't at 5250 for all the tests

That's called a "mistake".
HP is defined by torque (if using lb./ft) and RPM, the lines always cross there.
It crosses over at 5200 or 5300rpm if you count. The data wasn't recorded at 50rpm increments, so it's whatever the computer rounded to for display reasons, weirdly.

That test showed about what I expected. People do this all the time with DOHC valvetrains and it's hardly controversial. Put the centerlines where it makes the most power for your application and use.

Cranking compression means nothing. The compression that is important is the cylinder pressure just before the plug fires in a firing engine.
-Bob
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4815
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Another LSA test

Post by Stan Weiss »

Just to add something else about testing.

I post on another forum where stock an super stock racers post. One of them posted this.
I'm still using my Flowmaster 4-2-1 collectors, be for warned if you're going to use them with a " tight " lobe seperation , they don't work well with that.
The flowmasters seem to like a little wider lobe seperation angle. The Burns style collector works better with a tight lobe seperation. At least tha'ts what I've found over the years, and you have to try some adjustments to get everything from them.
Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9633
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Another LSA test

Post by David Redszus »

Cranking compression means nothing. The compression that is important is the cylinder pressure just before the plug fires in a firing engine.
Cranking compression is an indication of DCR which can be used to calculate other factors. And of cylinder leakage.
The cylinder pressure at IVC is the most important, since it tells us something about trapped charge.
What is the benefit of knowing cylinder pressure at ignition angle? If combined with cylinder temperature at ignition firing, pressure could provide an insight to the firing voltage required.
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7632
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Another LSA test

Post by PackardV8 »

Stan Weiss wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 11:14 am Just to add something else about testing. Stan
Agree, Stan. Everything affects everything else. Changing the overlap and the exhaust opening affects how the header scavenges. Crucial to evaluating the test result, is the build going to be run with dyno headers or on the strip with full street exhaust? Same overlap, different result.

It also affects and is affected by the intake; same overlap, a low-rise single plane 4-bbl, a tunnel ram and an IR system, all will behave differently and be affected differently by change in LSA/overlap.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9820
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Another LSA test

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2569
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Another LSA test

Post by Tom68 »

panic wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 10:16 am Oddly the crossover isn't at 5250 for all the tests

That's called a "mistake".
HP is defined by torque (if using lb./ft) and RPM, the lines always cross there.
Yer it's only the 107 that's out and it has a HP dip that doesn't look like it matches the torque curve.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9820
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Another LSA test

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

As a control for this test a 4th camshaft, same 230/236 cam in/ex lobes ground on 110 LSA could have been run on 101° intake C/L and 107° intake C/L and on 113° intake C/L.
and then "straight up" 110/110 in/ex C/L's

Lay these power and torque curves over the others and show the effect of just moving the exhaust installed C,/L around or moving the whole cam around.(110 LSA) (101/119), (107/113), (113/107) and (110/110)

Every power curve will be a bit different. No two exactly alike. ... BUT....

You'd then see that its where the intake C/L is installed that makes up the MOST DIFFERENCE in how the power,/ torque curve is shaped.
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9820
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: Another LSA test

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

Think that that conclusion is wrong.
Do the same thing but use the 107 LSA camshaft.
run the 107° LSA cam installed 101/113, 107/107, 110/104. and 113/101 installed in/ex centers
and compare these power curves to the others.

See a trend?
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2569
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Another LSA test

Post by Tom68 »

F-BIRD'88 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 2:57 pm As a control for this test a 4th camshaft, same 230/236 cam in/ex lobes ground on 110 LSA could have been run on 101° intake C/L and 107° intake C/L and on 113° intake C/L.
and then "straight up" 110/110 in/ex C/L's

Lay these power and torque curves over the others and show the effect of just moving the exhaust installed C,/L around or moving the whole cam around.(110 LSA) (101/119), (107/113), (113/107) and (110/110)

Every power curve will be a bit different. No two exactly alike. ... BUT....

You'd then see that its where the intake C/L is installed that makes up the MOST DIFFERENCE in how the power,/ torque curve is shaped.
We need one of these.
Twin Cam V8.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
User avatar
juuhanaa
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:14 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Another LSA test

Post by juuhanaa »

Tom68 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 3:55 pm
F-BIRD'88 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 2:57 pm As a control for this test a 4th camshaft, same 230/236 cam in/ex lobes ground on 110 LSA could have been run on 101° intake C/L and 107° intake C/L and on 113° intake C/L.
and then "straight up" 110/110 in/ex C/L's

Lay these power and torque curves over the others and show the effect of just moving the exhaust installed C,/L around or moving the whole cam around.(110 LSA) (101/119), (107/113), (113/107) and (110/110)

Every power curve will be a bit different. No two exactly alike. ... BUT....

You'd then see that its where the intake C/L is installed that makes up the MOST DIFFERENCE in how the power,/ torque curve is shaped.
We need one of these.

Twin Cam V8.jpeg
:shock:
Last edited by juuhanaa on Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2569
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Another LSA test

Post by Tom68 »

juuhanaa wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:17 pm
Tom68 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 3:55 pm
F-BIRD'88 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 2:57 pm As a control for this test a 4th camshaft, same 230/236 cam in/ex lobes ground on 110 LSA could have been run on 101° intake C/L and 107° intake C/L and on 113° intake C/L.
and then "straight up" 110/110 in/ex C/L's

Lay these power and torque curves over the others and show the effect of just moving the exhaust installed C,/L around or moving the whole cam around.(110 LSA) (101/119), (107/113), (113/107) and (110/110)

Every power curve will be a bit different. No two exactly alike. ... BUT....

You'd then see that its where the intake C/L is installed that makes up the MOST DIFFERENCE in how the power,/ torque curve is shaped.
We need one of these.

Twin Cam V8.jpeg
Wtf is that?
A separate intake and exhaust cam so you can change the lobe centers on the fly on a pushrod V8.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
User avatar
juuhanaa
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:14 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Another LSA test

Post by juuhanaa »

Tom68 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:20 pm
juuhanaa wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 5:17 pm
Tom68 wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 3:55 pm

We need one of these.

Twin Cam V8.jpeg
Wtf is that?
A separate intake and exhaust cam so you can change the lobe centers on the fly on a pushrod V8.
Okay cool. Sorry Tom my recent language, it was a shock.
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
Post Reply