289 EMC heads part 4

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

User avatar
Mummert
Expert
Expert
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 am
Location: El Cajon CA

289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Mummert »

Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
BLSTIC
Expert
Expert
Posts: 887
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:14 pm
Location: Australia

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by BLSTIC »

Thanks for answering my timing question! I wasn't expecting to see AB dyno, but your insight on the shape of the graph was great.

2 degrees of ignition lead requirement removal is a significant change in terms of efficiency and burn speed.

I wonder if I can do something similar on a quenched hemi (for lack of a better term) or a 4v head and get similar results
User avatar
Mummert
Expert
Expert
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 am
Location: El Cajon CA

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Mummert »

If you can get the electrode in a more beneficial spot you could see some gains.
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
steve cowan
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2270
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:22 am
Location: brisbane AUSTRALIA

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by steve cowan »

I am not a Ford guy but I certainly appreciate the work put in those heads,thank you for sharing information and videos.
steve c
"Pretty don't make power"
buddy rawls
Member
Member
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 4:38 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by buddy rawls »

very nice, but I have a question. Why did you use one of the best superstock castings? Its allowed 152cc's!!!! the same work could have been done on any of the 289 castings. have you got a tabular listing of the flows. I couldnt see the video plot clearly?
Buddy Rawls
Cross Section Engineering
User avatar
Mummert
Expert
Expert
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 am
Location: El Cajon CA

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Mummert »

The Hi Po heads in the video were what the customer wanted to use for his project. During the Engine Masters Challenge we used C5AE 2 barrel 289 castings. It was what the rules mandated. No Factory performance castings were allowed.

.050 33
.100 66
.200 123
.300 175
.400 208
.500 223
.600 232
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
Slither
New Member
New Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:41 pm
Location:

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Slither »

Nice video series and work!
Slither
Slither
New Member
New Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:41 pm
Location:

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Slither »

Do you have the exhaust flow numbers?
Slither
User avatar
Mummert
Expert
Expert
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 am
Location: El Cajon CA

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Mummert »

Exhaust flow numbers:

.050 26
.100 53
.200 104
.300 139
.400 163
.500 179
.600 181
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
Slither
New Member
New Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2020 4:41 pm
Location:

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Slither »

So these ended up flowing a little less than the original heads flowed?
Slither
Erland Cox
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4160
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Lund in Sweden
Contact:

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Erland Cox »

Swirl on a 2 valve is nothing positive.
I only means that the short side flows considerably less as the longside with rising lift.
What do the intake ports flow with inverted valves, just the stem through the throat?

Erland
User avatar
Mummert
Expert
Expert
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 am
Location: El Cajon CA

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Mummert »

Valves have a radical effect on trajectory of the plume. Swirl goes crazy high with the valves out, airflow only changes a couple percent. Our Y blocks lose flow when you invert the valves and flow the port wide open.
There is nothing negative with some swirl. Fuel efficiency is better, low speed torque as well. Alot of swirl is not good for sure.
The real problem when you try to get the swirl too low is that run the risk of it reversing and going the other way, and that not good. Swirl is crazy sensitive always moving. Any change a 100rpm or less is no change at all. Heads with "0" swirl will go +/- 50 rpm.
Compression ratio, squish to bore ratio and operating range are good indicators of how much you are or are not looking for.
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
Erland Cox
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4160
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Lund in Sweden
Contact:

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Erland Cox »

As swirl reverses usually at 0.25 D it is because of the short side loosing some flow.
A wake appears in the curtain area from the seat and flow only turns at the valve.

Erland
User avatar
Mummert
Expert
Expert
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:24 am
Location: El Cajon CA

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by Mummert »

The main thing that dictates a swirl pattern is bowl depth as well as short turn height in relation to valve diameter. The swirl pattern can be altered by chamber shrouding, valve shape, shortturn stability, valve job etc. Every head design has a minimum swirl it can achieve and your job is to try and keep it at the minimum. If 2000 rpm is the lowest a particular can go at full lift, than you need to keep it down there.
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
buddy rawls
Member
Member
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 4:38 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: 289 EMC heads part 4

Post by buddy rawls »

Mummert wrote: Tue Dec 13, 2022 1:18 am The Hi Po heads in the video were what the customer wanted to use for his project. During the Engine Masters Challenge we used C5AE 2 barrel 289 castings. It was what the rules mandated. No Factory performance castings
I didn’t even notice the heads in the video were hipo heads, I went straight to the flow chart. I thought it was the engine master head. So the the question gets even more valid. Except no longer why use the best 289 SS casting (rendering it illegal for any future SS build), to using the most expensive and valuable 289 castings, aside from a TA head. Why not go with any early head? Achieving equal results.

But, as it turns out, the owner contacted me to talk cars, Cobras actually. He is going for very very specific application, a near exact duplication of a Shelby Race motor, circa 63-65. He’s using all the original upper end components in as near Shelby modified condition as possible, including the Weber carb set up. Very nice.
Buddy Rawls
Cross Section Engineering
Post Reply