BBC oem cylinder head debate

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

houser45
Pro
Pro
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:05 pm
Location:

BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by houser45 »

Shop debate. Expert bbc guys give your imput.

Three engine scenarios. 1. low rpm truck or stockish street engine under 5000 rpm. 2. street high performance every day driver build.1500-6000 rpm 3. street/strip 7000 rpm engine

All 396 inch engines with hydraulic camshafts and 10.5 to 1 compression for pump fuel. Same cams, same compression ratio Oval port heads. Early closed chamber vs. semi closed 781 type heads. Who makes more horsepower and torque in each of the three combinations?
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7629
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by PackardV8 »

Then, the question arises, who builds a 396" today? Can't remember the last one we did.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
F-BIRD'88
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9817
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by F-BIRD'88 »

Agree 100% Find a 454 to build for either both purposes.
The open chamber bbc heads work better .
Sell/give the 396 to someone who is restoring or does not know any better.
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7629
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by PackardV8 »

F-BIRD'88 wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2023 5:16 pm Agree 100% Find a 454 to build for either both purposes.
The open chamber bbc heads work better .
Sell/give the 396 to someone who is restoring or does not know any better.
Since the Chicom forged strokers became good enough and cheap enough, I can't remember the last 454".
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2567
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by Tom68 »

houser45 wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:31 pm Shop debate. Expert bbc guys give your imput.

Three engine scenarios. 1. low rpm truck or stockish street engine under 5000 rpm. 2. street high performance every day driver build.1500-6000 rpm 3. street/strip 7000 rpm engine

All 396 inch engines with hydraulic camshafts and 10.5 to 1 compression for pump fuel. Same cams, same compression ratio Oval port heads. Early closed chamber vs. semi closed 781 type heads. Who makes more horsepower and torque in each of the three combinations?
The biggest head makes the most torque and horsepower.

The smallest head makes the least peak numbers, but it makes more earlier, then fall on its ass.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
mag2555
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4602
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by mag2555 »

Unless your building a motor that has a intended rpm range above 8K and also with a narrow 1500 rpm wide power band then it's not helpful as has been posted to run the biggest port volume head and Intake by any means, and this failed type of logic has been proven so over and over, and especially so with only 396 cid!

What you want to nail down in all three cases is the rpm range your willing to live with and then build for the highest average torque and hp numbers within a 2500 to 3000 rpm wide power band.

Even in your number 3 case it's still the average numbers that contribute the most to getting a vehicle to accelerate the mass that it has.
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
1980RS
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1647
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:03 am
Location:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by 1980RS »

That's an easy one, the open chamber will make more power over the closed chamber heads in most applications. I did this swap years ago when swapped out a set of 290 closed for a set of 781 both sets with stock valve sizes. Car was noticeably quicker and faster with the 781 open heads even with less compression. Same deal on my peanut port head test I did in 2019, the 215's were way slower than my 360 PP heads with a lot less compression. Go with the 781's and enjoy more power on less octane fuel.
vortecpro
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:10 pm
Location:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by vortecpro »

I did a 396 a few months back, it was .040 over, 10.5 comp, I used a 802 casting GM oval port closed chamber head, 2.190 intake, 1.780 exhaust, ported. The cam was a solid flat tappet 264 @ .050 on a 108. Performer RPM air gap intake. The oil pan was worked over, it made 551 HP and I believe around 512 TQ. I did a L78 375 HP 396 with some work before the oval port build, it had the factory cam and was done @ 471 HP, the cam was the cork. Hope this helps.
Racing a NA NHRA stocker should be mandatory before any posting.
1980RS
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1647
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 10:03 am
Location:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by 1980RS »

vortecpro wrote: Tue Feb 07, 2023 9:49 am I did a 396 a few months back, it was .040 over, 10.5 comp, I used a 802 casting GM oval port closed chamber head, 2.190 intake, 1.780 exhaust, ported. The cam was a solid flat tappet 264 @ .050 on a 108. Performer RPM air gap intake. The oil pan was worked over, it made 551 HP and I believe around 512 TQ. I did a L78 375 HP 396 with some work before the oval port build, it had the factory cam and was done @ 471 HP, the cam was the cork. Hope this helps.
Mark what do you think the power difference would be with the 802's you did vs a set of 781's ported with the big valves. For sure that factory 375hp cam was a pooch put in by GM back then. My milder Comp 282-S was a little more lift, less duration and LCA and the 375hp engine I had picked up a lot from that cam swap.
vortecpro
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:10 pm
Location:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by vortecpro »

I'm not sure. A 840 rectangle port head doesn't even start flowing until after .500 lift, after that it gets going.
Racing a NA NHRA stocker should be mandatory before any posting.
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6378
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by Walter R. Malik »

houser45 wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:31 pm Shop debate. Expert bbc guys give your imput.

Three engine scenarios. 1. low rpm truck or stockish street engine under 5000 rpm. 2. street high performance every day driver build.1500-6000 rpm 3. street/strip 7000 rpm engine

All 396 inch engines with hydraulic camshafts and 10.5 to 1 compression for pump fuel. Same cams, same compression ratio Oval port heads. Early closed chamber vs. semi closed 781 type heads. Who makes more horsepower and torque in each of the three combinations?
Personally, I would go with the 049 heads using larger intake valves.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
pamotorman
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2802
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:55 pm
Location:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by pamotorman »

OC heads fitted on a closed chamber race engine made 29 more HP even with less CR. this test was done at gulf research in pittsburgh
pamotorman
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2802
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 11:55 pm
Location:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by pamotorman »

OC cast iron oval port heads were available on 1974 454 1/2 ton PU engines
In-Tech
Vendor
Posts: 2818
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:35 am
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by In-Tech »

pamotorman wrote: Wed Feb 08, 2023 5:28 pm OC heads fitted on a closed chamber race engine made 29 more HP even with less CR. this test was done at gulf research in pittsburgh

OC cast iron oval port heads were available on 1974 454 1/2 ton PU engines
1973 454 even :) Isn't pittsburgh where you are from? You probably were involved in that test =D>
Heat is energy, energy is horsepower...but you gotta control the heat.
-Carl
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6378
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: BBC oem cylinder head debate

Post by Walter R. Malik »

Walter R. Malik wrote: Wed Feb 08, 2023 1:51 pm
houser45 wrote: Sun Feb 05, 2023 3:31 pm Shop debate. Expert bbc guys give your imput.

Three engine scenarios. 1. low rpm truck or stockish street engine under 5000 rpm. 2. street high performance every day driver build.1500-6000 rpm 3. street/strip 7000 rpm engine

All 396 inch engines with hydraulic camshafts and 10.5 to 1 compression for pump fuel. Same cams, same compression ratio Oval port heads. Early closed chamber vs. semi closed 781 type heads. Who makes more horsepower and torque in each of the three combinations?
Personally, I would go with the 049 heads using larger intake valves.
We used the 820 heads with the stock size valves, (which are oval port with kind-of a half open chamber, also having a large relief in the quench around the exhaust valve), in many 402 size engines with great success however, the 454 size engines preferred the 049's with a 2.19 diam. intake valve.

These engines road tested were 9 to 9.5 to 1 compression ratio street engines.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
Post Reply