Any researchers out there can probably identify with this:

[Kevin Johnson]

https://www.facebook.com/groups/reviewer2/permalink/

You know Reviewer 2:

The one who wrote "this has already been done" to reject your paper, without any references to the literature...

The one who sat on your paper for 6 months while they frantically ran their competing experiment...

The one who goes on an on about how the method you used sucks (except s/he misread the paper and you didn't use that method at all)...

The one who says "this could all be explained by attention" when you compare anything to anything (this is called attention-tology, and it works in getting your paper rejected even if attention has to be attributed to sub-atomic particle, an aubergine, or the GDP of a developing country)

Oh yes you know Reviewer 2...

--------------

Note: Reviewer 2 is not a number, it's a state of mind. Don't freak out if your number is "2" when you are reviewing, don't be surprised if reviewer 2 strikes as "1" or "3" or "4", etc.