My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
I believe in both. I use PipeMax daily. Here is my personal engine.
Dynoing on a Stuska with a 750 carburetorbt Siebert. It will have the elbow and TB on the car. We didn't beat on it! I will put it in the car and chassis dyno.
91 octane from Dillons
4.165 x 3.48
VFactor v2.35 ProFiler 205cc CNC
Ferrea 2.08/1.600 LS Valves
KMotion K800 springs
LGM rockers
Motown EFI Ported manifold
Scat LW crankshaft
Scat LW 6.00 rods
Mahle 1/1/2mm pistons
10.5-1
TPiS/Howards Billet solid roller
231/235 112 LSA 108 ICL
.580 lift
1/2 Manton pushrods
Morel full time oiling lifters
SA Billet chain
cast aluminum chain cover w/roller bearing
BBK billet pullies
Tuff Stuff aluminum water pump
TCI Rattler
Kevco NHRA Pan
Nitrous outlet elbow
TPiS 58mm billet TB
36lb injectors
Edelbrock Rails
Aeromotive regulator
Custom fabricated valve covers
Wix filter
Comp break in oil
NGK spark plugs
Dynoing on a Stuska with a 750 carburetorbt Siebert. It will have the elbow and TB on the car. We didn't beat on it! I will put it in the car and chassis dyno.
91 octane from Dillons
4.165 x 3.48
VFactor v2.35 ProFiler 205cc CNC
Ferrea 2.08/1.600 LS Valves
KMotion K800 springs
LGM rockers
Motown EFI Ported manifold
Scat LW crankshaft
Scat LW 6.00 rods
Mahle 1/1/2mm pistons
10.5-1
TPiS/Howards Billet solid roller
231/235 112 LSA 108 ICL
.580 lift
1/2 Manton pushrods
Morel full time oiling lifters
SA Billet chain
cast aluminum chain cover w/roller bearing
BBK billet pullies
Tuff Stuff aluminum water pump
TCI Rattler
Kevco NHRA Pan
Nitrous outlet elbow
TPiS 58mm billet TB
36lb injectors
Edelbrock Rails
Aeromotive regulator
Custom fabricated valve covers
Wix filter
Comp break in oil
NGK spark plugs
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
-
- Pro
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 10:06 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
Thanks for sharing Chad.
Hopefully Mr. Straub will continue to market CI as Rick did.
Hopefully Mr. Straub will continue to market CI as Rick did.
Mike R
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 4:04 pm
- Location: Abbeville, LA
- Contact:
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
big "Thanks" Chad !!!
wishing the same here for Rick's Controlled Induction !Hopefully Mr. Straub will continue to market CI as Rick did.
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
Question for you: are you simply raising the VE input until it shows the required intake port flow matches what your ports actually flow?
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
Yes but until it matches what the engine made for power. The difference is what wasn't accessed.
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
I see. I'm more concerned with using Pipemax to make sure all your ducks are in a row before the final build like "I want to make 'x' power so do I increase the VE input until the power matches my goal and then make sure the intake flows what Pipemax says it needs to?" or "I know my intake flows 'x' so do I adjust the VE input until it matches what Pipemax says it should flow and then look to see the predicted hp?"SpeierRacingHeads wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:22 amYes but until it matches what the engine made for power. The difference is what wasn't accessed.
I'm just not sure the best way to use the VE input prior to finalizing the engine combo. Did that make sense?
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
That's good way. Match it to what the induction flows. I ran it that way before I went. That is why on the 3rd pull when it made 530ish, I was content to just adjust timing and pull it off.RevTheory wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:30 amI see. I'm more concerned with using Pipemax to make sure all your ducks are in a row before the final build like "I want to make 'x' power so do I increase the VE input until the power matches my goal and then make sure the intake flows what Pipemax says it needs to?" or "I know my intake flows 'x' so do I adjust the VE input until it matches what Pipemax says it should flow and then look to see the predicted hp?"SpeierRacingHeads wrote: ↑Tue Nov 26, 2019 11:22 amYes but until it matches what the engine made for power. The difference is what wasn't accessed.
I'm just not sure the best way to use the VE input prior to finalizing the engine combo. Did that make sense?
It can get tricky and the new Pipemax takes into consideration vacuum pumps, low friction rings, dyno corrections, etc.
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
Thanks, Chad. That definitely helps clear a few things up. I guess the question now is how much would a guy anticipate a Performer RPM Air-Gap with a 1.5 inch, tapered spacer and a 750 pulling out of a 270 cfm port? Clear down to 230 ish?
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
Re: My PipeMax and CI Testimonial..
Right on.
Is this closer to the right way to use Pipemax and C.I.? I'm assuming 230 cfm through an RPM Air-Gap and I'm not looking to C.I. for LSA and lift because it doesn't know if I'm using 30* seats or 55s. I'm probably using 50s. Plugging 109% VE in C.I. is probably wrong but it doesn't change much.
I really need the newer versions.
Is this closer to the right way to use Pipemax and C.I.? I'm assuming 230 cfm through an RPM Air-Gap and I'm not looking to C.I. for LSA and lift because it doesn't know if I'm using 30* seats or 55s. I'm probably using 50s. Plugging 109% VE in C.I. is probably wrong but it doesn't change much.
I really need the newer versions.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.