Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much?
Moderator: Team
Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much?
I put a lot of work into one intake manifold to use with a set of heads I have. In addition to plenum work, they also required opening up the manifold runners & exits a good bit to match the heads.
However, I may not end up using those heads after all, and the heads that would be used instead have pretty much the size of the runners which this particular intake started off having... naturally.
With the proper surface prep, would Belzona 1111 be appropriate for "shrinking" the manifold runner exits this much to match the heads w/ the smaller port entries? I already have the Belzona on hand (unopened since purchase) thinking something might come up where I'd need it. Now I just want to get confirmation that I'm not expecting too much from an epoxy "fill job" like this.
Heads for which intake was modified to fit: Same heads with matching gasket: Small-port heads with their matching gasket: Big-port gasket on small-port heads: Big-port gasket over small-port gasket: Thanks! - Brad
However, I may not end up using those heads after all, and the heads that would be used instead have pretty much the size of the runners which this particular intake started off having... naturally.
With the proper surface prep, would Belzona 1111 be appropriate for "shrinking" the manifold runner exits this much to match the heads w/ the smaller port entries? I already have the Belzona on hand (unopened since purchase) thinking something might come up where I'd need it. Now I just want to get confirmation that I'm not expecting too much from an epoxy "fill job" like this.
Heads for which intake was modified to fit: Same heads with matching gasket: Small-port heads with their matching gasket: Big-port gasket on small-port heads: Big-port gasket over small-port gasket: Thanks! - Brad
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Before going to all that work, read this: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38868
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Yeah, I'd read that thread before... not really an "apples to apples" comparison, IMO. No way I'd run mine w/ this big of a intake-to-head oversize mismatch.V Remian wrote:Before going to all that work, read this: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38868
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
If anything will work, Belzona will. I like Belzona 1121 best, longer working time and longer shelf life. The 1111 only lasts about a year on the shelf.
I would not get carried away with shrinking the entire runner down, just use enough for a smooth transition.
Heck, I wouldn't even run the small port head on a BBM, unless the velocity profile was a lot better.
I would not get carried away with shrinking the entire runner down, just use enough for a smooth transition.
Heck, I wouldn't even run the small port head on a BBM, unless the velocity profile was a lot better.
The price of progress is trouble.
-
- Expert
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 6:46 pm
- Location: Crane, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Yes it will work, will work well.
Abbott Racing Heads and Engines
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
I'd hate to think my 1111 is garbage already without having even opened it, but I bet I've had it for close to a year, if not longer. That sh!t ain't cheap...
EDIT: Data sheets on both 1111 & 1121 say 5 years shelf life when stored properly. Mine has been in a room that's been between 68 - 72* F year around.
EDIT: Data sheets on both 1111 & 1121 say 5 years shelf life when stored properly. Mine has been in a room that's been between 68 - 72* F year around.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Balzona is overkill for that, in manifolds I have used a much more price freindly JB weld in the tube form, or a brick of Moroso or Manley epoxy, and have never had a issue .
I save my Balzona for use in heads and blocks !
I save my Balzona for use in heads and blocks !
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
I might try that manifold just as it is. I have had 1204 heads that pickup flow using a 1205 or 1206 radius! True. Thanks, Charlie
Servedio Cylinder Head Development
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Manley A/B got soft & lifted due to ethanol exposure from using E10 pump fuel. That's why I bought the Belzona this time.mag2555 wrote:Balzona is overkill for that, in manifolds I have used a much more price freindly JB weld in the tube form, or a brick of Moroso or Manley epoxy, and have never had a issue .
I save my Balzona for use in heads and blocks !
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
My flow testing has always shown flow reduction if the radius plate entry isn't a good match for the runner. Can't imagine how that would change by using an intake manifold that leaves a step in the direction of flow.Carnut1 wrote:I might try that manifold just as it is. I have had 1204 heads that pickup flow using a 1205 or 1206 radius! True. Thanks, Charlie
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
- Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
- Contact:
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
No Way ???BradH wrote:Yeah, I'd read that thread before... not really an "apples to apples" comparison, IMO. No way I'd run mine w/ this big of a intake-to-head oversize mismatch.V Remian wrote:Before going to all that work, read this: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38868
If you already have all your own answers, then why are you even on here asking these kinds of questions... ?
Especially when total mass airflow is only a small percentage of what it takes to make power.
"When testing, if the results differ from your theory ... believe the results and invent a new theory".
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
Specialty engine building at its finest.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 6:01 pm
- Location:
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
The other thing, think about how the air flows thru the manifold and head. The intake port of the head, is sucking the air thru the manifold, its not being pushed thru, unless its under boost, which, at that point, it just jamms it in anyhow. But, on a na deal, its sucking it thru, so, it really doesn't "slam" into the face of the cylinder head like most think. But, with that little difference, you could use the epoxy to shrink it down, no problem.
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
You would think. But it has happend to me a few times. Thanks, CharlieBradH wrote:My flow testing has always shown flow reduction if the radius plate entry isn't a good match for the runner. Can't imagine how that would change by using an intake manifold that leaves a step in the direction of flow.Carnut1 wrote:I might try that manifold just as it is. I have had 1204 heads that pickup flow using a 1205 or 1206 radius! True. Thanks, Charlie
Servedio Cylinder Head Development
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Please re-read MY original post: I wasn't asking about whether to run the intake w/ the mismatch. My question was whether Belzona would be suitable for reducing the runner size. OTHER people brought up the idea of using the intake "as is" w/ the mismatched entry sizes, not me.Walter R. Malik wrote:No Way ???BradH wrote:Yeah, I'd read that thread before... not really an "apples to apples" comparison, IMO. No way I'd run mine w/ this big of a intake-to-head oversize mismatch.V Remian wrote:Before going to all that work, read this: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38868
If you already have all your own answers, then why are you even on here asking these kinds of questions... ?
Especially when total mass airflow is only a small percentage of what it takes to make power.
"When testing, if the results differ from your theory ... believe the results and invent a new theory".
Also good luck at the EMC 2016.
Re: Can I use Belzona to "shrink" manifold runners this much
Frankshaft wrote:The other thing, think about how the air flows thru the manifold and head. The intake port of the head, is sucking the air thru the manifold, its not being pushed thru, unless its under boost, which, at that point, it just jamms it in anyhow. But, on a na deal, its sucking it thru, so, it really doesn't "slam" into the face of the cylinder head like most think. But, with that little difference, you could use the epoxy to shrink it down, no problem.
Can you explain the difference in the air flow, besides of course the density. In both cases you have a high and low pressure end, flow is going from the high pressure to the low pressure, it's not really being "sucked" nor "pushed", it's both.
LOL, according to the post count I'm an "expert." The only thing I'm an expert at is asking questions.