Smokey patented his device which was substantially imitated to become the Spintron. https://patents.google.com/patent/US5515712A/SchmidtMotorWorks wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:19 pmYou apparently have difficulty processing information honestly.Kevin Johnson wrote: ↑Sat Jun 01, 2019 7:59 amSchmidtMotorWorks wrote: ↑Fri May 31, 2019 10:41 pm ...
The video you recommended did not confirm your claims.The video cited from 1937 directly refuted both of your claims in the above sentence. The window is also visible and the light is played on the interior of the crankcase (backlit or internally lighted).SchmidtMotorWorks previously wrote: I have seen a crankshaft spinning dry at 3500 (it is a blur), there is no way that the human eye could see what they claim at higher rpm through an oil coated window.
You apparently have difficulty processing multiple information sources simultaneously. The phenomenological description of the mixed ligaments and droplet sizes conforms with the Ricardo Laboratories paper. Go back and reread at what rpm the crankcase was filled with oil mist which would allow the droplets to appear as ropes, taffy or tentacles.
Sad that I have to state the obvious:
Without a strobe light it would be a blur, Smokey made no mention of a strobe light.
This is an attempt to mislead on your part.
Further, the video with the strobe light was made from an end view of the crankshaft.
The plastic windows windows Smokey wrote about were on the side of the oil pan.
This is an attempt to mislead on your part.
When you can present data that directly supports the claims about taffy on a crankshaft I will be interested to see it.
So far, all we have is your imagination.
In the patent, window 30 is installed beneath the oil pan.
You're doing a pretty fair job of playing the fool for someone that claims to have been a consultant to OEMs. Keep it up.