Edelbrock E force heads #5089
Moderator: Team
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
You have to question the quality of the springs as mentioned.
I just pulled apart a set of E205 Edelbrock heads and open pressure was 240 lbs on a combo that had done less than 1000kms
I just pulled apart a set of E205 Edelbrock heads and open pressure was 240 lbs on a combo that had done less than 1000kms
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 11003
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: CA
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
It wasn't my project but I remember it being discussed in some meetings.
If I remember correctly, the issue was that the hydraulic rollers were bleeding out at high rpm and the valves were closing while the cam was still on a high velocity portion of the lobe.
If I remember correctly, the issue was that the hydraulic rollers were bleeding out at high rpm and the valves were closing while the cam was still on a high velocity portion of the lobe.
Helping to Deliver the Promise of Flying Cars
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
Is this a problem on this particular head and if so why? I have a set of these heads that came on a crate engine and it does have a roller cam installed.SchmidtMotorWorks wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:27 pm It wasn't my project but I remember it being discussed in some meetings.
If I remember correctly, the issue was that the hydraulic rollers were bleeding out at high rpm and the valves were closing while the cam was still on a high velocity portion of the lobe.
I don't know what the cam specs are as the builder did not include and that business is now defunct.
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
Not sure what those tests were showing but I've sold a lot of custom hydraulic roller camshafts for those E-Street heads using this spring kit and never had an issue.SchmidtMotorWorks wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:27 pm It wasn't my project but I remember it being discussed in some meetings.
If I remember correctly, the issue was that the hydraulic rollers were bleeding out at high rpm and the valves were closing while the cam was still on a high velocity portion of the lobe.
http://www.flowtechinduction.com/lunati ... 73925k2-f/
Not sure if the issues you mentioned were lobe, lifter or just the excessive valvetrain mass for the spring to control properly.
"Quality" is like buying oats. You can pay a fair price for it and get some good quality oats,
or you can get it a hell of a lot cheaper, when it's already been through the horse.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Ed Curtis - www.FlowTechInduction.com
or you can get it a hell of a lot cheaper, when it's already been through the horse.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Ed Curtis - www.FlowTechInduction.com
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
Thanks for the reply EDC. I am trying to figure out the best direction to go with this set of heads regarding camshaft selection.
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 11003
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: CA
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
It required a combination of parts to be a problem.Blakeslee wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 2:23 amIs this a problem on this particular head and if so why? I have a set of these heads that came on a crate engine and it does have a roller cam installed.SchmidtMotorWorks wrote: ↑Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:27 pm It wasn't my project but I remember it being discussed in some meetings.
If I remember correctly, the issue was that the hydraulic rollers were bleeding out at high rpm and the valves were closing while the cam was still on a high velocity portion of the lobe.
I don't know what the cam specs are as the builder did not include and that business is now defunct.
I don't remember the details, it wasn't my project.
Helping to Deliver the Promise of Flying Cars
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 11003
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
- Location: CA
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
IIRC, the issue was that through a combination of cam, lifter, spring, the valves were landing hard on the seats.
The parts used were outside of the intended application of those heads.
This is one of the problems you run into when you develop a part that is optimised for low cost.
Helping to Deliver the Promise of Flying Cars
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
Hi all, from the UK here and information on converting these heads for roller use is proving difficult.
Can anyone give me the correct valve spring part number to use on these e5089 heads to use with a stock 1986 block that has a factory roller cam?
Can anyone give me the correct valve spring part number to use on these e5089 heads to use with a stock 1986 block that has a factory roller cam?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
Need more info from you.
Are you in need of springs for a Hydro roller, or a solid roller?
What is your current valve spring installed height?
How much lift will the Cam you are looking to use have?
Are you in need of springs for a Hydro roller, or a solid roller?
What is your current valve spring installed height?
How much lift will the Cam you are looking to use have?
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
In need of valve spring recommendations for a stock 1986 roller camshaft
I cant answer for current installed springs height as my original heads are now disassembled i can give you the head castings numbers if this helps?
Im not entertaining putting in a upgrade cam with these heads so it'll just be a stock camshaft from 1986 from what i read the most aggressive lift is 0.525 from what ive managed to find on the factory roller cams from 86
Re: Edelbrock E force heads #5089
https://www.flowtechinduction.com/dsr-c ... pring-kit/dyna_dev wrote: ↑Tue Oct 17, 2023 9:20 amIn need of valve spring recommendations for a stock 1986 roller camshaft
I cant answer for current installed springs height as my original heads are now disassembled i can give you the head castings numbers if this helps?
Im not entertaining putting in a upgrade cam with these heads so it'll just be a stock camshaft from 1986 from what i read the most aggressive lift is 0.525 from what ive managed to find on the factory roller cams from 86
"Quality" is like buying oats. You can pay a fair price for it and get some good quality oats,
or you can get it a hell of a lot cheaper, when it's already been through the horse.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Ed Curtis - www.FlowTechInduction.com
or you can get it a hell of a lot cheaper, when it's already been through the horse.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Ed Curtis - www.FlowTechInduction.com