Port texture and velocity
Moderator: Team
Port texture and velocity
When going from a smooth port to a textured port, does the average velocity change?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9633
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Port texture and velocity
If the fluid flow is through a straight tube, there is very little change in velocity; a result of boundary layer effects.
If the tube is curved, the air mass will impact the walls and a textured surface will result in a higher friction loss.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Port texture and velocity
Velocity would only change overall if the flow rate has changed.
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
- Stan Weiss
- Vendor
- Posts: 4819
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
- Location: Philadelphia, PA
- Contact:
Re: Port texture and velocity
Chad,
Can you post some before and after cfm and velocity. We can then calculate what change in effective area the air is seeing.
Stan
Can you post some before and after cfm and velocity. We can then calculate what change in effective area the air is seeing.
Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
Re: Port texture and velocity
I did this honest hillbilly test.Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:33 pm Chad,
Can you post some before and after cfm and velocity. We can then calculate what change in effective area the air is seeing.
Stan
http://speierracingheads.com/burr-vs-60-grit.html
Re: Port texture and velocity
Great info Chad, would be interesting, would my iron heads be different such as like seeing bigger gains with the burr?SpeierRacingHeads wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 4:44 pmI did this honest hillbilly test.Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:33 pm Chad,
Can you post some before and after cfm and velocity. We can then calculate what change in effective area the air is seeing.
Stan
http://speierracingheads.com/burr-vs-60-grit.html
www.autotransdesign.com www.gzmotorsports.com
www.cranecams.com www.prosystemsracing.com
www.hardblok.com
Please say a prayer for all that serve and gave all to serve this Holiday and everyday!
www.cranecams.com www.prosystemsracing.com
www.hardblok.com
Please say a prayer for all that serve and gave all to serve this Holiday and everyday!
Re: Port texture and velocity
SpeierRacingHeads wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 4:44 pmI did this honest hillbilly test.Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Fri Dec 06, 2019 3:33 pm Chad,
Can you post some before and after cfm and velocity. We can then calculate what change in effective area the air is seeing.
Stan
http://speierracingheads.com/burr-vs-60-grit.html
Interesting for sure. I may have to do a rethink on some things. The only issue I have is getting the burr finish correct. I can't duplicate what your finish looks like.
Re: Port texture and velocity
i would have expected that the measured averages to be the same if the flow is the same
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9633
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Port texture and velocity
I would expect the flow rate to be somewhat lower with a textured surface due to an increase in the friction factor.
Re: Port texture and velocity
I'm working with and engine that by rule has a primary header smaller than the exhaust port.My thinking was that texturing the exhaust port would increase velocity thru the center of the port.Because of the small header I'm not using the whole port anyway.
Didn't work , small lose in power over polished port in A-B-A test.
I tried several ideals with poor results .The only thing that shown results is polishing the header till it is so thin that cracking is a problem .
Didn't work , small lose in power over polished port in A-B-A test.
I tried several ideals with poor results .The only thing that shown results is polishing the header till it is so thin that cracking is a problem .
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 945
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
Re: Port texture and velocity
Texture is totally wrong on the exhaust. The FASTER the localized airspeed, the more polished it should be. The SLOWER the localized airspeed, the rougher it should be. Remember, at the wall the air velocity is zero or near zero. The viscosity of the air is holding onto the wall so, the faster the air gets, the thinner the boundary layer gets. Regardless of surface texture. The surface texture is all wet flow any way. IMO around 1% flow loss is attributed to frictional wall drag of the boundary layer.RCJ wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 1:58 pm I'm working with and engine that by rule has a primary header smaller than the exhaust port.My thinking was that texturing the exhaust port would increase velocity thru the center of the port.Because of the small header I'm not using the whole port anyway.
Didn't work , small lose in power over polished port in A-B-A test.
I tried several ideals with poor results .The only thing that shown results is polishing the header till it is so thin that cracking is a problem .
Re: Port texture and velocity
The flow numbers were the same though so the average velocity is the same since the area is for all intensive purposes the sameDavid Redszus wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 11:56 amI would expect the flow rate to be somewhat lower with a textured surface due to an increase in the friction factor.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9633
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Port texture and velocity
Surface texture has an effect on flow coefficient in curved sections at higher velocities. Low pressure ratio measurements are quite inaccurate and should not be trusted for critical work.digger wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 3:05 pmThe flow numbers were the same though so the average velocity is the same since the area is for all intensive purposes the sameDavid Redszus wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 11:56 amI would expect the flow rate to be somewhat lower with a textured surface due to an increase in the friction factor.