Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

Tuner wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:34 pm
Stan Weiss wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:49 am
The DV modified carb will flow the needed cfm for 318 HP. As I said above seeing 5.5- 6" Hg @ WOT peak HP RPM which is 74.77-81.57" of water.

Does anyone know what kind of HP is be made from a Holley 500 CFM which is rated at 3" Hg / 40.785" of water?
Stan
(stolen from an internet search)
a gauge legal Holley 4412 500cfm has a hard time beyond about 470 hp, the 7448 350cfm is done at 415 hp
Tom68 wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:58 pm
Tuner wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:34 pm
(stolen from an internet search)
a gauge legal Holley 4412 500cfm has a hard time beyond about 470 hp, the 7448 350cfm is done at 415 hp
Assumed to be on a 350 no doubt, was the 350 gauge legal.

415 from a 350, I'm betting that'd have to be a 500 + HP engine with an appropriate size carby fitted.
I checked with someone who plays circle track 500 2bbl dyno games on a fairly regular basis and he has recently done on a 500 for a "dirt late model open 18 deg. head roller cam 630+ HP with a 4bbl" and it made 490 with the 500 4412.
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

Stan Weiss wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 5:23 pm

350 CFM Holley 2 is rated @ 3" Hg or 40.79" of water. So that is 290 cfm @ 28" water.

Suspect that 350cfm flows way more than 350 a 3".

The 500's for 2 barrel classes may flow between 570 and maybe as high as 670 at 3" as far as I can find.

All though that 670 is based on a calculation of RH getting 235CFM at 5" on a 4412X. Multiply that by 0.92 for wet flow and it's still 616.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Ks Fats
Pro
Pro
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:39 pm
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Ks Fats »

Evidently there is now an 89 throttle body manifold and various adaptors now in the mix; one of which adapts the holley 500 and one to adapt a stromberg that is similar to the large base bbd. By stacking adaptors they can also mount the smaller bbd to the manifold. If I was the guy that had all of that work in the single plane, resisting the impulse to punch who ever had this latest idea would have been difficult. If the original intent was to prove 318 hp with the small base carb it seems to potentially be off course; sailing around the horn with the sails at half-mast appears to be the UTG way though. This is stretching my computer skills so can't figure out how to do a link.
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

I like the Stromberg, just a shade bigger than the BBD.

Mission Impossible 318 project, TBI manifold and carb spacers.mp4_snapshot_03.44.066.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Dave B
Pro
Pro
Posts: 359
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:07 am
Location: Midwest

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Dave B »

We used to have a class on pavement roundy round. It used 500 cfm carb on 10 to 1 360 inch max.You could run factory heads or dart 2 stuff with no porting and same on intakes. The Vic Jr was pretty much the choice then. This had the spacers that allow you to move carb forward or back.455-470 hp was very common. You had to have 500 plus to be on the podium.The guy we helped was several time winner/champion of class and 522 hp was best I saw. There was no roller cams in these classes either.You had to get creative. And spending time on Dyno and getting to try allot of things it was evident that a 500 cfm carb is way more capable of moving more air through it than that.
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

User avatar
juuhanaa
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:14 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by juuhanaa »

Those who have been waiting for an update from a small fixture. I am back to a normal home schedule so i can work on it in the evenings.

Btw how do you know you are getting old? When you buy yourself a vacuum cleaner for your birthday.. #-o Just another problem really.

IMG20230227171531.jpg


-juhana
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

Tuner wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:02 pm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bMutygflmw
Not liking the Stromberg so much now (flow on the manifold is shite) looking from the bottom it looked half a chance.

Mission Impossible 318 project, TBI manifold and carb spacers.mp4_snapshot_01.48.490.jpg

From the top the venturi looks cluttered, unless the boosters are sitting up high.


Mission Impossible 318 project TBI intake ported flows..mp4_snapshot_00.05.583.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

Tom68 wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 11:49 pm
Tuner wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:02 pm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bMutygflmw
Not liking the Stromberg so much now (flow on the manifold is shite) looking from the bottom it looked half a chance.

Mission Impossible 318 project, TBI manifold and carb spacers.mp4_snapshot_01.48.490.jpg

From the top the venturi looks cluttered, unless the boosters are sitting up high.


Mission Impossible 318 project TBI intake ported flows..mp4_snapshot_00.05.583.jpg
I wonder if the throttle opens any further than it is in the picture. I have seen a few old Stromberg carbs that hit the WOT stop at about that angle, don't know why but perhaps for A/F distribution correction in the specific application for which the carb was intended.

Image
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

Tuner wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 1:01 am I wonder if the throttle opens any further than it is in the picture. I have seen a few old Stromberg carbs that hit the WOT stop at about that angle, don't know why but perhaps for A/F distribution correction in the specific application for which the carb was intended.

Image
Interesting, you'd expect Charles would have been onto that, but we're all Human and he was excited about the manifold, re distracted.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
HQM383
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 7:25 am
Location: Geelong, Vic

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by HQM383 »

Tuner wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 1:01 am
Tom68 wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 11:49 pm
Tuner wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 8:02 pm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bMutygflmw
Not liking the Stromberg so much now (flow on the manifold is shite) looking from the bottom it looked half a chance.


Mission Impossible 318 project, TBI manifold and carb spacers.mp4_snapshot_01.48.490.jpg


From the top the venturi looks cluttered, unless the boosters are sitting up high.



Mission Impossible 318 project TBI intake ported flows..mp4_snapshot_00.05.583.jpg
I wonder if the throttle opens any further than it is in the picture. I have seen a few old Stromberg carbs that hit the WOT stop at about that angle, don't know why but perhaps for A/F distribution correction in the specific application for which the carb was intended.

Image
Looking from the top view in the vid they are fully open. Probably the best he could do with one hand.
I’m a Street/Strip guy..... like to think outside the quadrilateral parallelogram.
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

HQM383 wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 1:31 am
Tuner wrote: Tue Feb 28, 2023 1:01 am
Tom68 wrote: Mon Feb 27, 2023 11:49 pm


Not liking the Stromberg so much now (flow on the manifold is shite) looking from the bottom it looked half a chance.


Mission Impossible 318 project, TBI manifold and carb spacers.mp4_snapshot_01.48.490.jpg


From the top the venturi looks cluttered, unless the boosters are sitting up high.



Mission Impossible 318 project TBI intake ported flows..mp4_snapshot_00.05.583.jpg
I wonder if the throttle opens any further than it is in the picture. I have seen a few old Stromberg carbs that hit the WOT stop at about that angle, don't know why but perhaps for A/F distribution correction in the specific application for which the carb was intended.

Image
Looking from the top view in the vid they are fully open. Probably the best he could do with one hand.
I don't think agree. Look at 0:08 and from 0:20 to about 0:35. The throttle plates are obviously at an angle similar to seen in the upside down view. However, although it is not clear, at 2:03 they appear to be vertical.
rebelrouser
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1944
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:25 pm
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by rebelrouser »

WeingartnerRacing wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:48 am
Bigchief632 wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 8:50 am
Tom68 wrote: Tue Feb 21, 2023 3:54 am

I think this is where a lot of us older guys started, buy 2 barrel V8 and start optimising it. Man when you put the first 4 barrel on it, wowee.
Uncle Tony isn't watchable. He's kind of hack that hasn't kept up with the times. He makes stupid videos as cheap as possible to come up with "content". It's about the YouTube content. That's what this is. It amazes me anyone cares. Funny, I could make a video highlighting the 15 degree 440 inch sbc, or 698 inch spread port BBC, or 900hp pump gas 555, or one of the other 20 engines I have in the works, and more people would follow this stupid waste of time. Unreal.

I completely understand. I don’t get either. Here I am spending 8k to build this dyno mule to test things people actually want to know and I get 3k views. Others spend no money give no real useful information and get 45k views.

Each dyno session is 1k if I’m lucky at the end of the year I make $500 from the video. I wouldn’t say my content is greatest by any means but at least people can get something useful out of it. Many times a day I think I don’t think this world should work this way or I’m on the wrong planet.

Ps I tested a two barrel on my mule on 4 of the manifolds it made about 1.2. I only did it because circle track has to run 2barrel. That was interesting because the best on 2barrel wasn’t on a 4barrel.
For what it is worth I watch your Youtube videos, good job. I don't understand how it works but the algorithm that pops videos on my TV is skewed, to bring up stuff like Uncle Tony's. One of your videos will pop up every now and then, but the stupid Uncle Tony's stuff pops up every time I watch the TV. Yes, I can go into search and find whatever I want, but I am just lazy sometimes. If you want more views figure out why they put your videos on the bottom of the algorithm list. I have other interests like sailing, and it is the same shit.
Post Reply