Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7633
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by PackardV8 »

Joe-71 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 11:28 am If that cast iron intake manifold will flow 182 cfm through all 8 runners, then he should be able to make 318 hp with a good head port, metric ring package, good solid lifter camshaft, and light weight valve train. Anything over 9.5-10.4:1 compression should get there with premium fuel. The exhaust manifolds can be hand ported, or extrude honed, and if you really want to push the envelope, hand port the manifold and then send it to extrude hone to clean up those tight corners that a burr would have trouble reaching. This endeavor sounds similar to an EMC challenge that has been proven possible. Joe-71
Hi, Joe, I'm not a fan of Extrude Honing for two reasons:
It makes what's bad worse, and what's good slightly better. It will not remove material in the short side of a radius, and remove most material from the long side.
They don't really like to do cast iron as they say, "It's as slow as a cat eatin' a grindstone." Last quote I got from Extrude Hone to do a cast iron V8 intake was $1500.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7633
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by PackardV8 »

duplicate, sorry
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

Joe-71 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 11:28 am If that cast iron intake manifold will flow 182 cfm through all 8 runners, then he should be able to make 318 hp with a good head port, metric ring package, good solid lifter camshaft, and light weight valve train. Anything over 9.5-10.4:1 compression should get there with premium fuel. The exhaust manifolds can be hand ported, or extrude honed, and if you really want to push the envelope, hand port the manifold and then send it to extrude hone to clean up those tight corners that a burr would have trouble reaching. This endeavor sounds similar to an EMC challenge that has been proven possible. Joe-71
8 cylinders, that's 8 intake strokes for 720 degrees of crankshaft rotation, lets say the effective intake stroke of the intake ports is a lowly 180 degrees, i.e. no inertia charging (and by hell it's gunna need that) that's 1440 degrees of intake strokes in 720 degrees of crank rotation, the carby has to flow around 300 cfm at 28". It isn't happening if all the air has to enter past those standard size butterflies in that baby carby and we're not using Nitro.

Pull the butterflies out and turn it into an oval single barrel and it might just do it.

Thought I better add the Nitro option since Uncle toby's involved.


1 barrel.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

Oooh ... it's getting better now !! =D>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLNRmvuvsoU
User avatar
juuhanaa
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:14 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by juuhanaa »

Tom68 wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 12:21 am
Joe-71 wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 11:28 am If that cast iron intake manifold will flow 182 cfm through all 8 runners, then he should be able to make 318 hp with a good head port, metric ring package, good solid lifter camshaft, and light weight valve train. Anything over 9.5-10.4:1 compression should get there with premium fuel. The exhaust manifolds can be hand ported, or extrude honed, and if you really want to push the envelope, hand port the manifold and then send it to extrude hone to clean up those tight corners that a burr would have trouble reaching. This endeavor sounds similar to an EMC challenge that has been proven possible. Joe-71
8 cylinders, that's 8 intake strokes for 720 degrees of crankshaft rotation, lets say the effective intake stroke of the intake ports is a lowly 180 degrees, i.e. no inertia charging (and by hell it's gunna need that) that's 1440 degrees of intake strokes in 720 degrees of crank rotation, the carby has to flow around 300 cfm at 28". It isn't happening if all the air has to enter past those standard size butterflies in that baby carby and we're not using Nitro.

Pull the butterflies out and turn it into an oval single barrel and it might just do it.

Thought I better add the Nitro option since Uncle toby's involved.



1 barrel.JPG
You make a good point.

2 liter 4 banger 195hp/6250rpm, 170degree@1mm lift cam and single 60mm throttle body on a dryflow manifold, so 159cfm per runner without the butterfly shaft? (Maybe i said 153cfm airflow hp limitation on a video lol..) 183cfm through one runner with or without the throttle body. :)

Its just amazing that some guys will swap cams with you and want to do their own testing with a 10 degree longer cam instead of listening to a throttle body and/or plenum mod for dyno hp! The same guy whose engine you were in charge of and helped to win the series.. #-o



-juhana
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
arlancam509
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:23 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by arlancam509 »

Super_Stock wrote: Thu Feb 23, 2023 5:19 pm
Charles is a member here, maybe we should be focusing on what he's trying to do and support him in that effort, instead of complaining about someone else's Youtube content and why he gets more views than others do.
I don't think there is enough support in this world for people trying things. Way too many people want to be in the "can't be done" camp.
° alt+0176 °
Joe-71
Pro
Pro
Posts: 297
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 5:46 pm
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Joe-71 »

The reason I suggested hand porting the intake manifold before sending it to extrude hone is because the process does not correct the shape of the port, only smoothes out the interior and enlarges the passages as they are. I have flowed several intakes that have been extruded, and was disappointed in the process. It is expensive for what you get in increase of performance, and my only suggestion was to agree that it is possible to make 1 hp/ci with an iron headed/intake manifold engine with proper selection of components and a bit of imagination in the process. I have ported iron intakes that had 180 cfm runners out to nearly 285 cfm average, so I do have experience with the process. No one even mentioned using acid to enlarge the ports, so that is still something to consider, also. BTDT on a lot of Stock Eliminator builds. Joe-71
Joe-71
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4815
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Stan Weiss »

Stan Weiss wrote: Mon Feb 20, 2023 9:17 am JMO
Charlie is seeing lets say 205 - 210 cfm without the carb @ 28" water. I believe the carb DV modified is flowing well above that @ 28" water. So the engine seeing 5.5- 6" Hg @ WOT peak HP RPM will have enough flow for 318 ci 318 HP Remember 2 barrels are rate @ 3" Hg from the factory.

Stan
Tom68 wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 12:21 am 8 cylinders, that's 8 intake strokes for 720 degrees of crankshaft rotation, lets say the effective intake stroke of the intake ports is a lowly 180 degrees, i.e. no inertia charging (and by hell it's gunna need that) that's 1440 degrees of intake strokes in 720 degrees of crank rotation, the carby has to flow around 300 cfm at 28". It isn't happening if all the air has to enter past those standard size butterflies in that baby carby and we're not using Nitro.

Pull the butterflies out and turn it into an oval single barrel and it might just do it.

Thought I better add the Nitro option since Uncle toby's involved.

1 barrel.JPG
The DV modified carb will flow the needed cfm for 318 HP. As I said above seeing 5.5- 6" Hg @ WOT peak HP RPM which is 74.77-81.57" of water.

Does anyone know what kind of HP is be made from a Holley 500 CFM which is rated at 3" Hg / 40.785" of water?

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

Unfortunately, this guy is still not securing the carb and spacers to the manifold with bolts or studs, so leak from between the flanges from the side is killing his flow numbers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYdWWX7Sq-8
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3230
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tuner »

Stan Weiss wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 10:49 am
The DV modified carb will flow the needed cfm for 318 HP. As I said above seeing 5.5- 6" Hg @ WOT peak HP RPM which is 74.77-81.57" of water.

Does anyone know what kind of HP is be made from a Holley 500 CFM which is rated at 3" Hg / 40.785" of water?
Stan
(stolen from an internet search)
a gauge legal Holley 4412 500cfm has a hard time beyond about 470 hp, the 7448 350cfm is done at 415 hp
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

Tuner wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:34 pm
(stolen from an internet search)
a gauge legal Holley 4412 500cfm has a hard time beyond about 470 hp, the 7448 350cfm is done at 415 hp
Assumed to be on a 350 no doubt, was the 350 gauge legal.

415 from a 350, I'm betting that'd have to be a 500 + HP engine with an appropriate size carby fitted.
Last edited by Tom68 on Fri Feb 24, 2023 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2570
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Tom68 »

arlancam509 wrote: Fri Feb 24, 2023 8:44 am Way too many people want to be in the "can't be done" camp.
That's the fun part, have an opinion and find out I'm wrong.

If nobody had a differing opinion there'd be no need for anything much.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by af2 »

So for a fact that he gained almost 40 hp from stock without the parts we have in the states and lives in Finland is pretty damn good in my book. Good Job!
GURU is only a name.
Adam
User avatar
juuhanaa
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 7:14 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by juuhanaa »

Thank you af2, i appreciate. Remember that Finland got help, Brewsters and other stuff during -40s!



-juhana
A balanced person dares to stagger, and modify ports bigger
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4815
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Mission Impossible 318ci 318HP

Post by Stan Weiss »

JMO / WAG math

350 CFM Holley 2 is rated @ 3" Hg or 40.79" of water. So that is 290 cfm @ 28" water.

► 290 cfm / 415 HP = 0.6988 cfm per HP

► 0.6988 cfm per HP * 318 HP = 222.2184 CFM @ 28" of water

DV's modified carb flows much better than this @ 28" of water.

____Bore_=_3.91_____Stroke_=_3.31_______Rod_Length_=_6.123_____Peak_HP_RPM_=_5400
____Wrist_Pin_Offset_=_0.0______________Number_of_Valves-_Intake_=_1_-_Exhaust_=_1
____Intake_Valve_Size_=_1.78____________Exhaust_Valve_Size_=_1.57
____Engine_Cubic_Inches_=_317.95180_____Number_of_Cylinders_=_8
____Single_Cylinder_CIs_=_39.74398______Blower_Pressure_=_0.0
____Air_/_Fuel_Ratio_=_13.2_____________Volumetric_Efficiency_=_85.75%
____BSFC_=_0.46500______________________BSAC_=_6.138
____Barometric_Pressure_=_29.92_________Temperature_=_60.0
____Fuel_Flow_=_147.673_lbs/hr__________SCFM_=_426.003
____Compression_Ratio_=_9.75____________

____Calculated_HP_317.89

All of that said until the engine gets dynoed we can only guess if it will or will not make the number

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Post Reply