Piston to Valve Clearance

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
peerless
New Member
New Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:19 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Piston to Valve Clearance

Post by peerless »

Ok guys building a engine for a customer. Nothing too radical and its a BMW straight six engine. I am getting conflicting information regarding the P to V clearance.

Right now I have about .065 (1.65mm) I am being told that I need .080-.100" clearance. The camshaft is a new billet with about .452" lift and 272 duration. 7K rev limit

I had another guy tell me:
I run around 0.6-0.7mm clearance on my race engines that go to 9k.
Which is only about .025"

The pistons are stock cast pieces with a single notch for the intake valve. Clearance is checked using a used stock headgasket at factory torque specs. I am using playdo and then check the depth.

Will .065 be enough or should I go deeper?

I ask you guys because I know the engine building experience here is above and beyond what I might get from a BMW board filled with mostly teenagers whose idea of rebuilding an engine is changing rings and bearings and calling it a day.

Thanks,
Robert
E30 Motor Werks
"Quality Care for your Classic BMW"

www.e30motorwerks.com
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7014
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Post by af2 »

peerless wrote:Ok guys building a engine for a customer. Nothing too radical and its a BMW straight six engine. I am getting conflicting information regarding the P to V clearance.

Right now I have about .065 (1.65mm) I am being told that I need .080-.100" clearance. The camshaft is a new billet with about .452" lift and 272 duration. 7K rev limit

I had another guy tell me:
I run around 0.6-0.7mm clearance on my race engines that go to 9k.
Which is only about .025"

The pistons are stock cast pieces with a single notch for the intake valve. Clearance is checked using a used stock headgasket at factory torque specs. I am using playdo and then check the depth.

Will .065 be enough or should I go deeper?

I ask you guys because I know the engine building experience here is above and beyond what I might get from a BMW board filled with mostly teenagers whose idea of rebuilding an engine is changing rings and bearings and calling it a day.

Thanks,


Intake or exhaust? Exhaust will be .080 min and .060 intake. Most people disagree so it is what it is!
bobqzzi
Expert
Expert
Posts: 941
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:03 pm
Location:

Re: Piston to Valve Clearance

Post by bobqzzi »

peerless wrote:Ok guys building a engine for a customer. Nothing too radical and its a BMW straight six engine. I am getting conflicting information regarding the P to V clearance.

Right now I have about .065 (1.65mm) I am being told that I need .080-.100" clearance. The camshaft is a new billet with about .452" lift and 272 duration. 7K rev limit

I had another guy tell me:
I run around 0.6-0.7mm clearance on my race engines that go to 9k.
Which is only about .025"

The pistons are stock cast pieces with a single notch for the intake valve. Clearance is checked using a used stock headgasket at factory torque specs. I am using playdo and then check the depth.

Will .065 be enough or should I go deeper?

I ask you guys because I know the engine building experience here is above and beyond what I might get from a BMW board filled with mostly teenagers whose idea of rebuilding an engine is changing rings and bearings and calling it a day.

Thanks,
.065" is plenty on the intake side and I would be comfortable with that on the exhaust side as well.
Ron C.
Expert
Expert
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Visalia, Calif
Contact:

Post by Ron C. »

The intake side is safer because the valve is chasing the piston, the spring is not as big a factor, so .60-.070 is usually safe. The exhaust is a different story since the piston chases the valve. Spring maintance is important if you run close clearances. So if that's not a factor then you can tighten it up to intake clearances. But I would keep your customer happy and be safe on the exhaust side.
If it's your own motor then tighter is up to you.

That's my story.........blessings.............Ron Clevenger.
Creekside Racing Ministry
John 14:6
Ron Clevenger
CSU Gas Dominator ProCharger nonintercooled
Top Eliminator West http://www.topeliminatorwest.net
Steve Morris http://www.stevemorrisengines.com
6.49@219mph (still tunning)
peerless
New Member
New Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:19 pm
Location: Orange County, CA

Post by peerless »

Thank you very much :)

And yes this was on the intake side, exhaust has plenty of clearance. New cam rockers and springs so everything is right and tight.

You have put my mind at ease, now I can button this thing up and get paid.

When ever I need good solid engine building advice I know it can be found here every time. Thanks again.
Robert
E30 Motor Werks
"Quality Care for your Classic BMW"

www.e30motorwerks.com
Hendrens Racing Engines
Pro
Pro
Posts: 400
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:43 pm
Location: Rutherfordton N.C.
Contact:

Post by Hendrens Racing Engines »

We have found that you can run the same minimum int valve to piston clearance as you do deck clearance. if you run .040 piston to deck you can run the same clearance on the int valve,if it doesn't hit the deck it wont hit the valve.Bill
Hendrens Racing Engines
1310 U.S.Hwy 221 North
Rutherfordton North Carolina 28139
828-286-0780
Tony B
Pro
Pro
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Mendenhall MS
Contact:

MINIMUMS

Post by Tony B »

Plus another .010.TB
Post Reply